From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@pa.msu.edu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, theo.lebrun@bootlin.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, charles.perry@microchip.com,
andrew@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: macb: add support for 1000BASE-X autonegotiation to PCS
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:58:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1b3d844-6d73-4ccd-b604-dc11dcbced4d@pa.msu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812015434.1687294-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On 8/11/26 21:54, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> net: macb: add support for 1000BASE-X autonegotiation to PCS
>
> This decouples PCS enablement from SGMII mode selection so the macb PCS
> can also be used in 1000BASE-X mode, advertises 1000BASE-X to phylink,
> and adds an autonegotiation restart implementation for the PCS.
>
> A few questions on the changes below.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> index c15a9c7e69d3..2252e6a55072 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> @@ -583,7 +583,12 @@ static void macb_pcs_get_state(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, unsigned int neg_mode,
>>
>> static void macb_pcs_an_restart(struct phylink_pcs *pcs)
>> {
>> - /* Not supported */
>> + struct macb *bp = container_of(pcs, struct macb, phylink_sgmii_pcs);
>> + u32 old, new;
>> +
>> + old = gem_readl(bp, PCSCNTRL);
>> + new = old | BMCR_ANRESTART;
>> + gem_writel(bp, PCSCNTRL, new);
>> }
>>
>> static int macb_pcs_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
>> @@ -609,8 +614,10 @@ static int macb_pcs_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
>> new = old | BMCR_ANENABLE;
>> else
>> new = old & ~BMCR_ANENABLE;
>> - if (old != new)
>> + if (old != new) {
>> gem_writel(bp, PCSCNTRL, new);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
> [Severity: Medium]
> Is the positive return here attached to the right register write? The
> kernel-doc for .pcs_config() in include/linux/phylink.h says:
>
> * When an autonegotiation restart is required for 802.3z modes, .pcs_config()
> * should return a positive non-zero integer (e.g. 1) to indicate to phylink
> * to call the pcs_an_restart() method.
>
> and phylink_mii_c22_pcs_config() derives that value from the advertisement
> write, not from the BMCR autonegotiation-enable write:
>
> ret = mdiobus_modify_changed(pcs->bus, pcs->addr,
> MII_ADVERTISE, 0xffff, adv);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> changed = ret;
>
> In macb_pcs_config() the earlier PCSANADV (clause 37 base page) write result
> is discarded:
>
> old = gem_readl(bp, PCSANADV);
> new = phylink_mii_c22_pcs_encode_advertisement(interface, advertising);
> if (new != -EINVAL && old != new)
> gem_writel(bp, PCSANADV, new);
>
> and 1 is returned only when the BMCR_ANENABLE bit in PCSCNTRL toggles.
>
> Does that mean an advertisement-only change never restarts autonegotiation?
> On an established in-band 1000BASE-X link, ethtool -A or ethtool -s ...
> advertise ... reaches phylink_change_inband_advert(), whose only trigger for
> the restart is the positive return:
>
> ret = phylink_pcs_config(pl->pcs, pl->pcs_neg_mode, &pl->link_config,
> !!(pl->link_config.pause & MLO_PAUSE_AN));
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> if (ret > 0)
> phylink_pcs_an_restart(pl);
>
> Since PCSAUTONEG is on out of reset and phylink keeps it on for in-band mode
> (default_an_inband is set in macb_mii_probe()), PCSCNTRL is unchanged, 0 is
> returned, and the freshly written base page is never put on the wire until a
> link bounce or a larger reconfiguration. The newly added
> macb_pcs_an_restart() would then not be reached for the advertisement case
> the ops contract describes, while the case that does return 1 (the
> autonegotiation enable/disable toggle) is not the case a restart is asked
> for.
>
> Would recording a changed flag in the PCSANADV branch and returning that,
> as phylink_mii_c22_pcs_config() does, be more in line with the contract?
>
> Also, could the commit message mention the change of pcs_config() return
> semantics?
>
> [ ... ]
This is a good catch and the patch is indeed wrong; apologies. I will
resend a corrected one, and also make the suggested change to the commit
message.
>> @@ -957,7 +966,8 @@ static struct phylink_pcs *macb_mac_select_pcs(struct phylink_config *config,
>>
>> if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER)
>> return &bp->phylink_usx_pcs;
>> - else if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
>> + else if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX ||
>> + interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but the continuation line in macb_mac_select_pcs() is
> indented with a tab followed by spaces, which checkpatch.pl flags as "code
> indent should use tabs where possible".
Ah, OK, this can be fixed.
>
>> return &bp->phylink_sgmii_pcs;
>> else
>> return NULL;
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -1061,9 +1072,12 @@ static int macb_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>> bp->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
>> phy_interface_set_rgmii(bp->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
>>
>> - if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_PCS)
>> + if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_PCS) {
>> + __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX,
>> + bp->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
>> __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
>> bp->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
>> + }
>>
>> if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_HIGH_SPEED) {
>> __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER,
>> @@ -4932,7 +4946,9 @@ static int macb_init_dflt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> /* Set MII management clock divider */
>> val = macb_mdc_clk_div(bp);
>> val |= macb_dbw(bp);
>> - if (bp->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
>> + if (bp->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX)
>> + val |= GEM_BIT(PCSSEL);
>> + else if (bp->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
>> val |= GEM_BIT(SGMIIEN) | GEM_BIT(PCSSEL);
>> macb_writel(bp, NCFGR, val);
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does the serdes get brought up when phy-mode is "1000base-x"?
> init_reset_optional() still gates the serdes and ZynqMP GEM power-management
> setup on SGMII only:
>
> if (bp->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII) {
> /* Ensure PHY device used in SGMII mode is ready */
> bp->phy = devm_phy_optional_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> ...
> ret = zynqmp_pm_set_gem_config(pm_info[1], GEM_CONFIG_SGMII_MODE, 1);
>
> With phy-mode = "1000base-x" on a part with MACB_CAPS_PCS that uses
> init_reset_optional(), bp->phy stays NULL, so the later
> phy_set_mode_ext(bp->phy, ...) and phy_power_on(bp->phy) calls in
> macb_open() are no-ops, while macb_init_dflt() and macb_mac_config() still
> set GEM_BIT(PCSSEL) and macb_mii_probe() advertises 1000BASE-X. Would that
> leave the interface up with an unconfigured, unpowered serdes and no
> diagnostic?
The equipment we are using this for (custom electronics for a particle
physics experiment) operates with a phy-mode of "1000base-x" in its
default device tree, so I can confirm this works fully correctly in that
mode.
>
> I could not determine from the tree whether the GT serdes and the
> GEM_CONFIG_SGMII_MODE firmware call are strictly required for 1000BASE-X on
> those parts, so this may be fine on the affected hardware. Should
> init_reset_optional() cover PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX as well, for
> consistency with the four sites updated here?
This particular block, per an earlier discussion
(https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/DKH9Z0IMH95B.3JWB4PXQC9SN5@bootlin.com/),
is ZynqMP-specific and onboard-SGMII-PHY specific, so does not apply to
1000BASE-X mode and I had left it alone here. It certainly could be
updated for consistency, but that doesn't seem to be needed, either.
Happy to go either way on this.
-Nathan
--
Nathan Whitehorn (he/him)
Associate Professor
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Michigan State University
Biomedical and Physical Sciences 3225
East Lansing, MI 48824
(517) 884-5563
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 20:07 [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] net: macb: 1000BASE-X on internal PCS Nathan Whitehorn
2026-08-07 20:07 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: macb: Poll for link state changes when using the " Nathan Whitehorn
2026-08-12 1:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 2:48 ` Nathan Whitehorn
2026-08-07 20:07 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: macb: add support for 1000BASE-X autonegotiation to PCS Nathan Whitehorn
2026-08-12 1:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 2:58 ` Nathan Whitehorn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1b3d844-6d73-4ccd-b604-dc11dcbced4d@pa.msu.edu \
--to=nwhitehorn@pa.msu.edu \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=charles.perry@microchip.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox