From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RFC 2/6] page_pool: unify frag_count handling in page_pool_is_last_frag()
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:39:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e201644d-c9bd-52d9-9d26-a18bc4def21f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629120226.14854-3-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:02:22 +0800
> Currently when page_pool_create() is called with
> PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag, page_pool_alloc_pages() is only
> allowed to be called under the below constraints:
> 1. page_pool_fragment_page() need to be called to setup
> page->pp_frag_count immediately.
> 2. page_pool_defrag_page() often need to be called to drain
> the page->pp_frag_count when there is no more user will
> be holding on to that page.
[...]
> @@ -352,12 +377,10 @@ static inline bool page_pool_is_last_frag(struct page_pool *pool,
> {
> /* We assume we are the last frag user that is still holding
> * on to the page if:
> - * 1. Fragments aren't enabled.
> - * 2. We are running in 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA.
> - * 3. page_pool_defrag_page() indicate we are the last user.
> + * 1. We are running in 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA.
> + * 2. page_pool_defrag_page() indicate we are the last user.
> */
> - return !(pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) ||
> - PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT ||
> + return PAGE_POOL_DMA_USE_PP_FRAG_COUNT ||
> (page_pool_defrag_page(page, 1) == 0);
Just noticed while developing: after this change, the first function
argument, i.e. @pool, is not needed anymore and can be removed.
[...]
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-10 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 12:02 [PATCH v5 RFC 0/6] introduce page_pool_alloc() API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 1/6] page_pool: frag API support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-07 23:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-09 12:39 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 18:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-08 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-09 12:54 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 18:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-11 10:59 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-11 16:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-11 16:59 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-11 20:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12 12:34 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-12 17:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-14 12:16 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-14 13:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-07-14 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-17 12:33 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-18 18:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-18 18:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-19 12:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 2/6] page_pool: unify frag_count handling in page_pool_is_last_frag() Yunsheng Lin
2023-07-10 14:39 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-07-11 11:47 ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 3/6] page_pool: introduce page_pool[_cache]_alloc() API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 4/6] page_pool: remove PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 5/6] page_pool: update document about frag API Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 20:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-29 12:02 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 6/6] net: veth: use newly added page pool API for veth with xdp Yunsheng Lin
2023-06-29 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 RFC 0/6] introduce page_pool_alloc() API Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-30 11:57 ` Yunsheng Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e201644d-c9bd-52d9-9d26-a18bc4def21f@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).