netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller"	 <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski	 <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman	 <horms@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	 brandona@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: add a slot to rqstp->rq_bvec for TCP record marker
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 16:05:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2790cb8cc46a3272825a7e471d1352c5509ee98.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008-rq_bvec-v1-2-7f23d32d75e5@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2025-10-08 at 14:58 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> svc_tcp_sendmsg steals a slot in the rq_bvec array for the TCP record
> marker. If the send is an unaligned READ call though, then there may not
> be enough slots in the rq_bvec array.
> 
> Add a slot to the rq_bvec array, and fix up the array length
> calculations.
> 
> Fixes: e18e157bb5c8 ("SUNRPC: Send RPC message on TCP with a single sock_sendmsg() call")
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c        | 6 +++---
>  net/sunrpc/svc.c     | 3 ++-
>  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 77f6879c2e063fa79865100bbc2d1e64eb332f42..c4e9300d657cf7fdba23f2f4e4bdaad9cd99d1a3 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ nfsd_direct_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  
>  	v = 0;
>  	total = dio_end - dio_start;
> -	while (total && v < rqstp->rq_maxpages &&
> +	while (total && v < rqstp->rq_maxpages + 1 &&
>  	       rqstp->rq_next_page < rqstp->rq_page_end) {
>  		len = min_t(size_t, total, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		bvec_set_page(&rqstp->rq_bvec[v], *rqstp->rq_next_page,
> @@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ __be32 nfsd_iter_read(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  
>  	v = 0;
>  	total = *count;
> -	while (total && v < rqstp->rq_maxpages &&
> +	while (total && v < rqstp->rq_maxpages + 1 &&
>  	       rqstp->rq_next_page < rqstp->rq_page_end) {
>  		len = min_t(size_t, total, PAGE_SIZE - base);
>  		bvec_set_page(&rqstp->rq_bvec[v], *rqstp->rq_next_page,
> @@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  	if (stable && !fhp->fh_use_wgather)
>  		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
>  
> -	nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, payload);
> +	nvecs = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages + 1, payload);
>  	iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec, nvecs, *cnt);
>  	since = READ_ONCE(file->f_wb_err);
>  	if (verf)
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> index 4704dce7284eccc9e2bc64cf22947666facfa86a..919263a0c04e3f1afa607414bc1893ba02206e38 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> @@ -706,7 +706,8 @@ svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node)
>  	if (!svc_init_buffer(rqstp, serv, node))
>  		goto out_enomem;
>  
> -	rqstp->rq_bvec = kcalloc_node(rqstp->rq_maxpages,
> +	/* +1 for the TCP record marker */
> +	rqstp->rq_bvec = kcalloc_node(rqstp->rq_maxpages + 1,
>  				      sizeof(struct bio_vec),
>  				      GFP_KERNEL, node);
>  	if (!rqstp->rq_bvec)
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 377fcaaaa061463fc5c85fc09c7a8eab5e06af77..5f8bb11b686bcd7302b94476490ba9b1b9ddc06a 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	if (svc_xprt_is_dead(xprt))
>  		goto out_notconn;
>  
> -	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages, xdr);
> +	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec, rqstp->rq_maxpages + 1, xdr);
>  
>  	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec,
>  		      count, rqstp->rq_res.len);
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>  	memcpy(buf, &marker, sizeof(marker));
>  	bvec_set_virt(rqstp->rq_bvec, buf, sizeof(marker));
>  
> -	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec + 1, rqstp->rq_maxpages - 1,
> +	count = xdr_buf_to_bvec(rqstp->rq_bvec + 1, rqstp->rq_maxpages,
>  				&rqstp->rq_res);
>  
>  	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, rqstp->rq_bvec,


Mike suggested that we add more info to the changelog that will
actually get committed to the kernel. How about this?

-----------------------------8<---------------------------
    sunrpc: add a slot to rqstp->rq_bvec for TCP record marker
    
    We've seen some occurrences of messages like this in dmesg on some knfsd
    servers:
    
        xdr_buf_to_bvec: bio_vec array overflow
    
    Usually followed by messages like this that indicate a short send:
    
        rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: sent 1048155 when sending 1048152 bytes - shutting down socket
    
    svc_tcp_sendmsg() steals a slot in the rq_bvec array for the TCP record
    marker. If the send is an unaligned READ call though, then there may not
    be enough slots in the rq_bvec array in some cases.
    
    Add a slot to the rq_bvec array, and fix up the array lengths in the
    callers that care.
    
    Fixes: e18e157bb5c8 ("SUNRPC: Send RPC message on TCP with a single sock_sendmsg() call")
    Tested-by: Brandon Adams <brandona@meta.com>
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
-----------------------------8<---------------------------
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-08 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 18:58 [PATCH 0/2] sunrpc: fix handling of rq_bvec array in svc_rqst Jeff Layton
2025-10-08 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc: account for TCP record marker in rq_bvec array when sending Jeff Layton
2025-10-08 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: add a slot to rqstp->rq_bvec for TCP record marker Jeff Layton
2025-10-08 19:18   ` Jeff Layton
2025-10-08 20:05   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-10-08 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] sunrpc: fix handling of rq_bvec array in svc_rqst Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2790cb8cc46a3272825a7e471d1352c5509ee98.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=brandona@meta.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).