Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Biju Das <biju.das.au@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ravb: Add Rx checksum offload support
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:42:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e27edbff-8fa9-339a-4e6d-d72776286aa6@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124102115.132154-2-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

On 1/24/24 1:21 PM, Biju Das wrote:

> TOE has hw support for calculating IP header and TCP/UDP/ICMP checksum

   s/hw/hardware/.

> for both IPV4 and IPV6.

   Those are usually called IPv4 and IPv6, no?

> Add Rx checksum offload supported by TOE for IPV4 and TCP/UDP protocols.
> 
> For Rx, the result of checksum calculation is attached to last 4byte
> of ethernet frames.

   "For Rx, the 4-byte result of checksum calculation is attached to the
Ethernet frames", you wanted to say?

> First 2bytes is result of IPV4 header checksum
> and next 2 bytes is TCP/UDP/ICMP.

   TCP/UDP/ICMP checksum, you mean? Also, you alternatively say
TCP/UDP/ICMP and just TCP/UDP -- which one is correct?

> If frame does not have error "0000" attached to checksum calculation

   "If a frame does not have checksum error, 0x0000 is attached as
a checksum calculation result", you wanted to say?

> result. For unsupported frames "ffff" is attached to checksum calculation

   s/to/as/?

> result. Cases like IPV6, IPV4 header is always set to "FFFF".

   "In case of an IPv6 packet, IPv4 checksum is always set to 0xFFFF",
you wanted to say?

> We can test this functionality by the below commands
> 
> ethtool -K eth0 rx on --> to turn on Rx checksum offload
> ethtool -K eth0 rx off --> to turn off Rx checksum offload
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> index e0f8276cffed..a2c494a85d12 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
>  #define RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_ALL	0x00000006
>  #define RAVB_RXTSTAMP_ENABLED	0x00000010	/* Enable RX timestamping */
>  
> +/* GbEthernet TOE hardware checksum values */
> +#define TOE_RX_CSUM_OK	0x0000

   As I said before, this is hardly needed...

[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 0e3731f50fc2..59c7bedacef6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -522,6 +522,26 @@ static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
> +static void ravb_csum_offload_init_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev)

   I'd leave out _offload...

> +{
> +	bool rx_enable = ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> +	u32 csr0;
> +
> +	if (!rx_enable)
> +		return;
> +
> +	csr0 = ravb_read(ndev, CSR0);

   Why read it here, if we'll write a constant to this reg at the end
of ravb_emac_init_gbeth()?

> +	ravb_write(ndev, csr0 & ~(CSR0_RPE | CSR0_TPE), CSR0);

   We can just write 0 here, no?

> +	if (ravb_wait(ndev, CSR0, CSR0_RPE | CSR0_TPE, 0)) {
> +		netdev_err(ndev, "Timeout Enabling HW CSUM failed\n");

   "Timeout enabling hardware checksum\n", perhaps?

[...]
> +
> +	ravb_write(ndev, csr0, CSR0);

    I think we should move:

	ravb_write(ndev, CSR0_TPE | CSR0_RPE, CSR0);

from ravb_emac_init_gbeth() here...

> +}
> +
[...]
> @@ -734,6 +755,32 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	__wsum csum_ip_hdr, csum_proto;
> +	u8 *hw_csum;
> +
> +	/* The hardware checksum status is contained in sizeof(__sum16) * 2 = 4
> +	 * bytes appended to packet data. First 2 bytes is ip header csum and
> +	 * last 2 bytes is protocol csum.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16) * 2))
> +		return;
> +
> +	hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - sizeof(__sum16);
> +	csum_proto = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)get_unaligned_le16(hw_csum));
> +
> +	hw_csum -= sizeof(__sum16);
> +	csum_ip_hdr = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)get_unaligned_le16(hw_csum));
> +	skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 2 * sizeof(__sum16));
> +
> +	/* TODO: IPV6 Rx csum */
> +	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && csum_ip_hdr == TOE_RX_CSUM_OK &&
> +	    csum_proto == TOE_RX_CSUM_OK)
> +		/* Hardware validated our checksum */
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;

   Don't we need to set skb->csum_level?

[...]
> @@ -2337,8 +2388,32 @@ static void ravb_set_rx_csum(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
>  static int ravb_set_features_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev,
>  				   netdev_features_t features)
>  {
> -	/* Place holder */
> -	return 0;
> +	netdev_features_t changed = ndev->features ^ features;
> +	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 csr0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	csr0 = ravb_read(ndev, CSR0);
> +	ravb_write(ndev, csr0 & ~(CSR0_RPE | CSR0_TPE), CSR0);
> +	ret = ravb_wait(ndev, CSR0, CSR0_RPE | CSR0_TPE, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_wait;

   I don't understand: why do you clear the CSR0 bits even if
(changed & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) is 0? This looks very wrong...

> +
> +	if (changed & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) {
> +		if (features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> +			ravb_write(ndev, CSR2_ALL, CSR2);
> +		else
> +			ravb_write(ndev, 0, CSR2);
> +	}

   I think you should put that into a separate function, like
is done for the EhterAVB...

[...]
> @@ -2518,6 +2593,8 @@ static const struct ravb_hw_info gbeth_hw_info = {
>  	.emac_init = ravb_emac_init_gbeth,
>  	.gstrings_stats = ravb_gstrings_stats_gbeth,
>  	.gstrings_size = sizeof(ravb_gstrings_stats_gbeth),
> +	.net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,
> +	.net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,

   What about NETIF_F_IP_CSUM, BTW?

[...]

MBR, Sergey

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 10:21 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Add HW checksum offload support for RZ/G2L GbEthernet IP Biju Das
2024-01-24 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ravb: Add Rx checksum offload support Biju Das
2024-01-25 20:42   ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2024-01-25 22:15     ` Biju Das
2024-01-29 20:59       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-01-30 17:00         ` Biju Das
2024-01-24 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] ravb: Add Tx " Biju Das
2024-01-26 21:00   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-01-28  9:21     ` Biju Das
2024-01-25 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Add HW checksum offload support for RZ/G2L GbEthernet IP Sergey Shtylyov
2024-01-25 22:08   ` Biju Das
2024-01-26 19:01     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2024-01-25 19:11 ` Sergey Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e27edbff-8fa9-339a-4e6d-d72776286aa6@omp.ru \
    --to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
    --cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox