From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CB9C48BCD for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A8F613B6 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234710AbhFIPFK (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:05:10 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:59664 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232446AbhFIPFH (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:05:07 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 159F340Y076944; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:03:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1623250984; bh=OAtpdMKEWVQ9YW9nLXIwRCyDoKCWVnm+kcDeskm2VhE=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qTscTW8MlD4ZMspi1VbyTX8rP8GEDeRiIOQaMzC555nKy54aE+9fmogM2dK6HmTfE 4L/Ol15dsOQJQq/4F2oO9ni25yUhd1/sYWVVkl2XVUFGZj+pwJLyOKfpGn4/UiefnZ QtxpiJlWldFkgQLQ45xO/tKj5j/0jzJ4NPFM87V4= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 159F34VZ026197 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from [10.250.100.73] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 159F31nI019469; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:03:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFT net-next] net: ti: add pp skb recycling support To: Matteo Croce , Lorenzo Bianconi CC: , Lorenzo Bianconi , David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Ilias Apalodimas , Jesper Dangaard Brouer References: From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:02:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org hi On 09/06/2021 15:20, Matteo Croce wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:01 PM Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: >> >> As already done for mvneta and mvpp2, enable skb recycling for ti >> ethernet drivers >> >> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi > > Looks good! If someone with the HW could provide a with and without > the patch, that would be nice! > What test would you recommend to run? -- Best regards, grygorii