netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Daniil Tatianin <d-tatianin@yandex-team.ru>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:37:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3065103-d38c-1b80-5b61-71e8ba017e71@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eda87740-669c-a6e1-9c71-a9a92d3b173a@broadcom.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2915 bytes --]

On 6/1/23 11:27, Justin Chen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/1/23 9:22 AM, Justin Chen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/1/2023 8:55 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> + Daniil Tatianin <d-tatianin@yandex-team.ru>, Andrew Lunn 
>>> <andrew@lunn.ch>
>>>    as per ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git-min-percent 25 
>>> net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote:
>>>> The netlink version of set_wol checks for not supported wolopts and 
>>>> avoids
>>>> setting wol when the correct wolopt is already set. If we do the 
>>>> same with
>>>> the ioctl version then we can remove these checks from the driver 
>>>> layer.
>>>
>>> Hi Justin,
>>>
>>> Are you planning follow-up patches for the driver layer?
>>>
>>
>> I was planning to for the Broadcom drivers since those I can test. But 
>> I could do it across the board if that is preferred.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>>>> index 6bb778e10461..80f456f83db0 100644
>>>> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>>>> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
>>>> @@ -1436,15 +1436,25 @@ static int ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device 
>>>> *dev, char __user *useraddr)
>>>>   static int ethtool_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, char __user 
>>>> *useraddr)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    struct ethtool_wolinfo wol;
>>>> +    struct ethtool_wolinfo wol, cur_wol;
>>>>       int ret;
>>>> -    if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_wol)
>>>> +    if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_wol || !dev->ethtool_ops->set_wol)
>>>>           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>
>>> Are there cases where (in-tree) drivers provide set_wol byt not get_wol?
>>> If so, does this break their set_wol support?
>>>
>>
>> My original thought was to match netlink set wol behavior. So drivers 
>> that do that won't work with netlink set_wol right now. I'll skim 
>> around to see if any drivers do this. But I would reckon this should 
>> be a driver fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
> 
> I see a driver at drivers/net/phy/microchip.c. But this is a phy driver 
> set_wol hook.

That part of the driver appears to be dead code. It attempts to pretend 
to support Wake-on-LAN, but it does not do any specific programming of 
wake-up filters, nor does it implement get_wol. It also does not make 
use of the recently introduced PHY_ALWAYS_CALL_SUSPEND flag.

When it is time to determine whether to suspend the PHY or not, 
eventually phy_suspend() will call phy_ethtool_get_wol(). Since no 
get_wol is implemented, the wol.wolopts will remain zero, therefore we 
will just suspend the PHY.

I suspect this was added to work around MAC drivers that may forcefully 
try to suspend the PHY, but that should not even be possible these days.

I would just remove that logic from microchip.c entirely.
-- 
Florian


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4221 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31 20:53 [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ioctl: improve error checking for set_wol Justin Chen
2023-06-01 15:55 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-01 16:03   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-01 16:23     ` Simon Horman
2023-06-01 16:23     ` Justin Chen
2023-06-01 16:22   ` Justin Chen
2023-06-01 18:27     ` Justin Chen
2023-06-01 18:37       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2023-06-01 18:48         ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-01 18:58           ` Justin Chen
2023-06-01 20:41             ` Woojung.Huh
2023-06-02  8:54     ` Simon Horman
2023-06-05 18:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-05 18:46 Justin Chen
2023-06-07  3:54 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3065103-d38c-1b80-5b61-71e8ba017e71@broadcom.com \
    --to=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=d-tatianin@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).