From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcus Better Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-d80211: proper implementation of virtual interface support Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:26:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200605012135.00895.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060502132037.059a7cb2@griffin.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46738 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030302AbWEDT1g (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 15:27:36 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FbjTk-0001jR-Bq for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 21:27:12 +0200 Received: from 67.152.216.81.g-va.siw.siwnet.net ([81.216.152.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 May 2006 21:27:12 +0200 Received: from marcus by 67.152.216.81.g-va.siw.siwnet.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 May 2006 21:27:12 +0200 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jiri Benc wrote: > This is unnecessary. AFAIK bcm43xx hardware doesn't support more than one > interface at a time (not counting monitor interfaces as those are somewhat > special). I wonder what exactly is causing this limitation? Why isn't it just a matter of software support? Marcus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEWlUrXjXn6TzcAQkRAoa6AJ97kI8F7Q42orjNQC6HBIXwj3I/DwCgux18 RBkhEcOFBDtQGEHFq2eMxKU= =3WoL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----