From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+c711ce17dd78e5d4fdcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, haoluo@google.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] WARNING in reg_bounds_sanity_check
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 14:13:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e43c25b451395edff0886201ad3358acd9670eda.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df2cdc5f4fa16a4e3e08e6a997af3722f3673d38.camel@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 10:26 -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 19:14 +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 11:54:27AM -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
[...]
> > > I think is_branch_taken() modification should not be too complicated.
> > > For JSET it only checks tnum, but does not take ranges into account.
> > > Reasoning about ranges is something along the lines:
> > > - for unsigned range a = b & CONST -> a is in [b_min & CONST, b_max & CONST];
> > > - for signed ranged same thing, but consider two unsigned sub-ranges;
> > > - for non CONST cases, I think same reasoning can apply, but more
> > > min/max combinations need to be explored.
> > > - then check if zero is a member or 'a' range.
> > >
> > > Wdyt?
> >
> > I might be missing something, but I'm not sure that works. For the
> > unsigned range, if we have b & 0x2 with b in [2; 10], then we'd end up
> > with a in [2; 2] and would conclude that the jump is never taken. But
> > b=8 proves us wrong.
>
> I see, what is really needed is an 'or' joined mask of all 'b' values.
> I need to think how that can be obtained (or approximated).
I think the mask can be computed as in or_range() function at the
bottom of the email. This gives the following algorithm, if only
unsigned range is considered:
- assume prediction is needed for "if a & b goto ..."
- bits that may be set in 'a' are or_range(a_min, a_max)
- bits that may be set in 'b' are or_range(b_min, b_max)
- if computed bit masks intersect: both branches are possible
- otherwise only false branch is possible.
Wdyt?
[...]
---
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
static uint64_t or_range(uint64_t lo, uint64_t hi)
{
uint64_t m;
uint32_t i;
m = hi;
i = 0;
while (lo != hi) {
m |= 1lu << i;
lo >>= 1;
hi >>= 1;
i++;
}
return m;
}
static uint64_t or_range_simple(uint64_t lo, uint64_t hi)
{
uint64_t m = 0;
uint64_t v = 0;
for (v = lo; v <= hi; v++)
m |= v;
return m;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int max = 0x1000;
for (int lo = 0; lo < max; lo++) {
for (int hi = lo; hi < max; hi++) {
uint64_t expected = or_range_simple(lo, hi);
uint64_t result = or_range(lo, hi);
if (expected != result) {
printf("mismatch: %x..%x -> expecting %lx, result %lx\n",
lo, hi, expected, result);
return 1;
}
}
}
printf("all ok\n");
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-04 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 1:55 [syzbot] [bpf?] WARNING in reg_bounds_sanity_check syzbot
2025-07-03 17:02 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-03 18:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 17:14 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-04 17:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-04 21:13 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-07-04 21:27 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-07 22:30 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-07 23:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-08 0:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-08 0:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-08 0:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-08 16:19 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-08 17:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-07 21:57 ` Paul Chaignon
2025-07-07 23:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-07-05 16:02 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e43c25b451395edff0886201ad3358acd9670eda.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+c711ce17dd78e5d4fdcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).