netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 22/33] vhost scsi: add lun parser helper
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:33:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e499986d-ade5-23bd-7a04-fa5eb3f15a56@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201129210650.GP643756@sasha-vm>

On 29/11/20 22:06, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 06:34:01PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 29/11/20 05:13, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> Which doesn't seem to be suitable for stable either...  Patch 3/5 in
>>>
>>> Why not? It was sent as a fix to Linus.
>>
>> Dunno, 120 lines of new code?  Even if it's okay for an rc, I don't 
>> see why it is would be backported to stable releases and release it 
>> without any kind of testing.  Maybe for 5.9 the chances of breaking 
> 
> Lines of code is not everything. If you think that this needs additional
> testing then that's fine and we can drop it, but not picking up a fix
> just because it's 120 lines is not something we'd do.

Starting with the first two steps in stable-kernel-rules.rst:

Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into 
the "-stable" tree:

  - It must be obviously correct and tested.
  - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context.

> Plus all the testing we have for the stable trees, yes. It goes beyond
> just compiling at this point.
> 
> Your very own co-workers (https://cki-project.org/) are pushing hard on
> this effort around stable kernel testing, and statements like these
> aren't helping anyone.

I am not aware of any public CI being done _at all_ done on vhost-scsi, 
by CKI or everyone else.  So autoselection should be done only on 
subsystems that have very high coverage in CI.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201125153550.810101-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 17/33] net: stmmac: dwmac_lib: enlarge dma reset timeout Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 19/33] vhost: add helper to check if a vq has been setup Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 20/33] vhost scsi: alloc cmds per vq instead of session Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 21/33] vhost scsi: fix cmd completion race Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 22/33] vhost scsi: add lun parser helper Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 17:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-25 18:01     ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 18:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-29  4:13         ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-29 17:34           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-29 21:06             ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-30  8:33               ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-11-30 13:28                 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 13:52                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 13:57                     ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 14:00                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 17:34                         ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-30 17:38                 ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-30 17:52                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:44                     ` Mike Christie
2020-11-30 20:29                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 23:59                         ` Sasha Levin
2020-12-04  8:27                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-04 15:49                             ` Sasha Levin
2020-12-04 16:12                               ` Joe Perches
2020-12-04 17:08                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-05 20:59                                 ` Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 23/33] vhost scsi: Add support for LUN resets Sasha Levin
2020-11-25 15:35 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 32/33] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done after HW reset Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e499986d-ade5-23bd-7a04-fa5eb3f15a56@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).