From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH NET 3/3] net: hns: add configuration constraints for 1000M
 half
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:08:45 +0800
Message-ID: <e4b9af46-3f16-9cff-41ad-a520f648f13f@huawei.com>
References: <1535082143-122281-1-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com>
 <1535082143-122281-4-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com>
 <20180824034119.GA29111@lunn.ch>
 <194ac663-94d8-55e2-0231-a6be53e35f04@huawei.com>
 <20180824132857.GA1999@lunn.ch>
 <7c40c758-2ef2-665d-f429-0cc4e63a7a38@huawei.com>
 <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>, <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org



On 2018/8/26 2:07, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> This patch is a  theoretical protect, and the problem does not really
>> happen.
>>
>> I think you really get the point, do you think we need this patch?
> I think it is not needed.
>
> And if it was needed, it would indicate there is a bug somewhere else.
Hi, Andrew

It is a theoretical protect,we can remove  this patch from patchset.

Thanks.

>
>      Andrew
>
> .
>