From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-178.mta1.migadu.com (out-178.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5D32AF1B for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 20:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756843346; cv=none; b=IoO105/lnjQgvfWhZ6HieadgNrBBfwIHyKxdjNY6niJRzIzWSygPlLI032U2P7sxT+zr6T2OHHkQCEx8Ih5+Q8o3jXOpkiRl+DgskNcMuoNZUd/CauLKfcfgmK4iSp7GE5KnW17JllcgbiBfrIw+QNbN8mw75KRQYf1vT/JscqI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756843346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zc04ghhfwnLRYRShTKVcLauO8ktPn1CgQwQAw+WpMOw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fYv0F4A/c7TAX70lxuYbgl5XsS3XNMImLGsJ2sHO3ZhB7uqG8iUz3DEIM9rhOJXko6GJP6+LZ8WT/5dCK1k9eorhac0N8QitYb+7NeAATiitDfcoJuVNpd1l0kySh0bhVdfrLgw61cIOkfYssC2Ksb+9UHQi+8b1DK8HEJZEkCs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=OLXt4ft+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="OLXt4ft+" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1756843332; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V+JdT4Wgnn25xoKItxxRHwiaGiuoeCjlMg47tKTZurc=; b=OLXt4ft+EpnjRXIZmAiCQ2oECVKnBMwtzNEmoH5x9y0uerjqHjo5szzMXgNjLaQqfwMX4E 1HjtIpSvSChjXXVCKdFdjbwSHvCDhHmJz8/NX4njxPtPhHJi3e4t2ymLj5e16vj+rgNf8d KxqiI8VrpgRVlk2qEqGH45ogH95lML8= Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:02:03 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next/net 3/5] bpf: Introduce SK_BPF_MEMCG_FLAGS and SK_BPF_MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED. To: Kuniyuki Iwashima Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Neal Cardwell , Willem de Bruijn , Mina Almasry , Kuniyuki Iwashima , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20250829010026.347440-1-kuniyu@google.com> <20250829010026.347440-4-kuniyu@google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Martin KaFai Lau In-Reply-To: <20250829010026.347440-4-kuniyu@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 8/28/25 6:00 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, > char *optval, int *optlen, > bool getopt) > @@ -5284,6 +5313,7 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, > case SO_BINDTOIFINDEX: > case SO_TXREHASH: > case SK_BPF_CB_FLAGS: > + case SK_BPF_MEMCG_FLAGS: > if (*optlen != sizeof(int)) > return -EINVAL; > break; > @@ -5293,8 +5323,15 @@ static int sol_socket_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (optname == SK_BPF_CB_FLAGS) > + switch (optname) { > + case SK_BPF_CB_FLAGS: > return sk_bpf_set_get_cb_flags(sk, optval, getopt); > + case SK_BPF_MEMCG_FLAGS: I would remove the getsockopt only support from the other hooks that cannot do the setsockopt. There are other ways for them to read sk->sk_memcg if it is really needed. > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG) || !getopt) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + return sk_bpf_get_memcg_flags(sk, optval); Instead, do this only in bpf_sock_create_getsockopt.