Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: manjunath.b.patil@oracle.com
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: saeedm@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
	mbloch@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: retain command mailboxes after timeout
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 10:23:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5c3ab5d-f949-4df0-9aa5-757fb2806546@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179106228380.434549.9362571159733636097@kernel.org>


On 10/3/26 2:18 PM, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
> 
> Critical: 0 · High: 2 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
Hi,

Thank you for the review. We have examined the three reported issues and
will address the command-entry teardown ordering, the race between 
software EQ recovery and reset-triggered completion, and retained 
mailbox ownership during polling-mode teardown. We will validate those 
changes and return with a v2 patch.

Thanks,
Manjunath

pw-bot: cr
> 
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
> 
> - [High] Retained mailboxes are freed after cmd_ent_put() has already
>    released the slot.
> - [High] A reset flush can now consume the retained FW reference while a
>    software EQ-recovery pass is processing the late real completion for…
> - [Medium] Mailboxes now owned by the entry are never released on normal
>    command-interface teardown, so dma_pool_destroy() finds the pool busy…
> 
> --
> 
> net/mlx5: retain command mailboxes after timeout
> 
> After a command timeout, this patch gives the command entry ownership of
> its input and output mailboxes, and cmd_free_ent() frees them on the final
> reference. A new helper, mlx5_cmd_claim_completion(), takes the
> PENDING_COMP claim and hands off the firmware reference under alloc_lock.
> Triggered (reset) completions now drop a reference that an earlier timeout
> kept.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> index 84583dc5eb1c0..22508b26972de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> @@ -142,8 +142,19 @@ cmd_alloc_ent(struct mlx5_cmd *cmd, struct mlx5_cmd_msg *in,
>>   	return ent;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void free_msg(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_cmd_msg *msg);
>> +static void mlx5_free_cmd_msg(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
>> +			      struct mlx5_cmd_msg *msg);
>> +
>>   static void cmd_free_ent(struct mlx5_cmd_work_ent *ent)
>>   {
>> +	if (test_bit(MLX5_CMD_ENT_STATE_RETAIN_MSGS, &ent->state)) {
>> +		struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = container_of(ent->cmd,
>> +							  struct mlx5_core_dev, cmd);
>> +
>> +		mlx5_free_cmd_msg(dev, ent->out);
>> +		free_msg(dev, ent->in);
>> +	}
>>   	kfree(ent);
>>   }
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Can these retained mailboxes be freed after the command DMA pool has
> already been destroyed?
> 
> cmd_ent_put() releases the slot and the semaphore under alloc_lock. It
> then drops the lock and only after that calls cmd_free_ent():
> 
> cmd_ent_put() {
>      ...
> 	if (ent->idx >= 0) {
> 		cmd_free_index(cmd, ent->idx);
> 		up(ent->page_queue ? &cmd->vars.pages_sem : &cmd->vars.sem);
> 	}
> 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmd->alloc_lock, flags);
> 
> 	cmd_free_ent(ent);
> }
> 
> With this patch, cmd_free_ent() calls dma_pool_free() on cmd->pool
> through mlx5_free_cmd_msg(). free_msg() can also list_add the input msg
> back onto msg->parent->head.
> 
> For an async command, cb_timeout_handler() runs on system_wq and holds its
> own reference. Its forced mlx5_cmd_comp_handler() call sets RETAIN_MSGS and
> TIMEDOUT and runs the user callback, so mlx5_async_ctx teardown stops
> waiting. Only after that does it call cmd_ent_put().
> 
> The firmware reference can be dropped first, either by a late real
> completion or by mlx5_cmd_trigger_completions(), which drops both the
> firmware reference and its own temporary one. In that case the put in
> cb_timeout_handler() is the final one.
> 
> Once that put calls up(), the down_trylock() loop in mlx5_cmd_flush() can
> succeed. Error recovery or unload can then continue into
> mlx5_cmd_disable():
> 
> 	flush_workqueue(cmd->wq);
> 	clean_debug_files(dev);
> 	destroy_msg_cache(dev);
> 	free_cmd_page(dev, cmd);
> 	dma_pool_destroy(cmd->pool);
> 
> This flushes only cmd->wq. It does not flush system_wq or the
> cb_timeout_work items.
> 
> Suppose the timeout worker is preempted after it drops alloc_lock and
> resumes after this point. Would cmd_free_ent() then call dma_pool_free() on
> a freed struct dma_pool, or add the input msg to a destroyed cache list?
> 
> Before this patch, this window only covered kfree(ent), which never
> touched the pool.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -1732,6 +1744,66 @@ static void free_msg(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_cmd_msg *msg)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> + * A blocking timeout retains the mailboxes even when a real completion has
>> + * claimed PENDING_COMP. That handler keeps its firmware-event reference until
>> + * it finishes using the mailboxes. Keeping the reference transitions under
>> + * alloc_lock prevents timeout, firmware, and reset from consuming the same
>> + * reference.
>> + */
>> +static bool mlx5_cmd_claim_completion(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
>> +				      struct mlx5_cmd_work_ent *ent, u64 vec,
>> +				      bool forced, bool *drop_fw_ref)
>> +{
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +	} else if (!forced) {
>> +		clear_bit(MLX5_CMD_ENT_STATE_TIMEDOUT, &ent->state);
>> +		*drop_fw_ref = true;
>> +	} else if (vec & MLX5_TRIGGERED_CMD_COMP) {
>> +		/* Reset cannot receive a late firmware completion. */
>> +		*drop_fw_ref = test_and_clear_bit(MLX5_CMD_ENT_STATE_TIMEDOUT,
>> +						  &ent->state);
>> +	}
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Can a reset flush and a late real completion both drop the same retained
> firmware reference here?
> 
> Start with entry A, which has already timed out (PENDING_COMP clear,
> TIMEDOUT set). Only its firmware reference keeps it alive.
> 
> Thread R: another command's timeout calls mlx5_cmd_eq_recover(). That runs
> mlx5_eq_async_int(ASYNC_EQ_RECOVER) in process context. cmd_comp_notifier()
> passes its INTERNAL_ERROR check, and mlx5_cmd_comp_handler(dev, vec, false)
> reads ent = cmd->ent_arr[i] without taking a reference.
> 
> Thread F: enter_error_state() sets INTERNAL_ERROR and calls
> mlx5_cmd_flush()->mlx5_cmd_trigger_completions().
> mlx5_eq_synchronize_cmd_irq() does not wait for R, because R is not running
> in IRQ context.
> 
> The sequence would be:
> 
> F: cmd_ent_get(cmd->ent_arr[i])          /* temporary ref */
> F: mlx5_cmd_claim_completion()
>       vec & MLX5_TRIGGERED_CMD_COMP
>       test_and_clear_bit(TIMEDOUT) -> true
>     cmd_ent_put(ent)                      /* drops fw ref */
> R: mlx5_cmd_claim_completion()
>       !forced
>       *drop_fw_ref = true                 /* unconditional */
>     cmd_ent_put(ent)                      /* drops F's temp ref */
>       -> refcount 0, ent_arr[i] = NULL, cmd_free_ent()
> F: cmd_ent_put(cmd->ent_arr[i])          /* NULL or a new entry */
> 
> Would the trailing put in mlx5_cmd_trigger_completions() then dereference
> NULL? Or would it drop a reference on an unrelated entry that has reused
> slot i?
> 
> If F finishes completely first, R's claim would touch the freed entry
> instead.
> 
> The comment above says:
> 
>      Keeping the reference transitions under alloc_lock prevents timeout,
>      firmware, and reset from consuming the same reference.
> 
> The !forced branch does not check whether TIMEDOUT is still set, so does
> the helper actually enforce this?
> 
> In the baseline, the triggered path never dropped the reference of an
> entry with TIMEDOUT set, so this sequence stayed balanced.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -2008,9 +2082,12 @@ static int cmd_exec(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, void *in, int in_size, void *out,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	err = mlx5_cmd_invoke(dev, inb, outb, out, out_size, callback, context,
>> -			      pages_queue, token, force_polling);
>> +			      pages_queue, token, force_polling, &retain_msgs);
>>   	if (callback && !err)
>>   		return 0;
>> +	/* The entry releases retained DMA mailboxes with its final reference. */
>> +	if (retain_msgs)
>> +		goto out_up;
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> What releases these retained mailboxes on a normal command interface
> teardown?
> 
> Take a command that times out while the interface is up and its opcode is
> allowed. mlx5_cmd_claim_completion() sets RETAIN_MSGS and TIMEDOUT and
> keeps the firmware reference. cmd_exec() now skips freeing inb and outb.
> 
> Only two things drop that reference: a later real completion, or a
> MLX5_TRIGGERED_CMD_COMP flush. The flush only runs from
> enter_error_state().
> 
> mlx5_function_disable() and the err_cmd_cleanup path in
> mlx5_function_enable() call mlx5_cmd_disable() without either:
> 
> err_cmd_cleanup:
> 	mlx5_cmd_set_state(dev, MLX5_CMDIF_STATE_DOWN);
> 	mlx5_cmd_disable(dev);
> 
> mlx5_cmd_disable() then runs destroy_msg_cache() and
> dma_pool_destroy(cmd->pool) while the retained blocks are still allocated.
> dma_pool_destroy() sees nr_active != 0, prints "dma_pool_destroy mlx5_cmd
> busy", and skips dma_free_coherent() for every page.
> 
> Does this leak all of the pool's coherent pages, including the ones backing
> the whole message cache?
> 
> A retained cached input msg is also not on ch->head, so destroy_msg_cache()
> never frees it.
> 
> Polling mode is active during mlx5_function_enable(), and it seems to reach
> this easily:
> 
> cmd_work_handler() {
>      ...
> 	if (cmd_mode == CMD_MODE_POLLING || poll_cmd) {
> 		poll_timeout(ent);
> 		/* make sure we read the descriptor after ownership is SW */
> 		rmb();
> 		mlx5_cmd_comp_handler(dev, 1ULL << ent->idx, !!ent->ret);
> 	}
> }
> 
> There is no command EQ yet, so no late completion can arrive. If
> MANAGE_PAGES, SET_ISSI or QUERY_ISSI times out and mlx5_function_enable()
> then fails, the pool leaks.
> 
> Before this patch, cmd_exec() freed the mailboxes at timeout, so only the
> ent struct and its slot leaked.
> 
> A less certain follow-on: if a triggered flush drops the retained
> reference after mlx5_cmd_disable() has run, would cmd_free_ent() call
> dma_pool_free() on the destroyed pool? cmd->pool is not cleared.
> 
>>   
>>   	if (err > 0) /* Failed in FW, command didn't execute */
>>   		err = deliv_status_to_err(err);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 20:56 [PATCH net] net/mlx5: retain command mailboxes after timeout Manjunath Patil
2026-10-02 20:58 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 21:33   ` manjunath.b.patil
2026-10-03 21:18 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-05 17:23   ` manjunath.b.patil [this message]
2026-10-06 13:01 ` Moshe Shemesh
2026-10-06 19:42   ` manjunath.b.patil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5c3ab5d-f949-4df0-9aa5-757fb2806546@oracle.com \
    --to=manjunath.b.patil@oracle.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox