From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CA1C3A5A6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761B7217D6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neratec.com header.i=@neratec.com header.b="iToj46hy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390204AbfISOtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:49:22 -0400 Received: from mail.neratec.com ([46.140.151.2]:41493 "EHLO mail.neratec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389041AbfISOtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:49:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 591 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:49:21 EDT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.neratec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B65CE08F5; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.neratec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.neratec.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id FIx9KfitQU0N; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.neratec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F37CE0904; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.neratec.com 82F37CE0904 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neratec.com; s=9F5C293A-195B-11E9-BBA5-B4F3B9D999CA; t=1568903968; bh=vaMZdO/c0ybbuvIBNMGdGA7moqdUvFEpfWfjrtGDT8A=; h=To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; b=iToj46hyBY6zdAIlFTazhXSbktouysVs7yuepTEWQlrsYipYfY+J3CxOd9NuplPGF mqfwxzUR9HcNwIM1h59no8CKwXXm68Vs69ustjcA968yJNdN57tXEIfWrBgIJXV2Eh 3QVOfo5ExMsy4yCg6qkyWlcXdOGnBhdj3muhtGoUkCbwroxzYI3qp7UWIk8DOL4yc1 RPMKq+K1OfWm17fDb5m8dkJS6+vjIGMoaIkcFyNUe3IU3c9z3Ps/rFy/1w4mbWJGsn Vi5WCBPRZ4nE8NJO9i4GMohlxzW20i3IR8H6FAJz0Ad7fSYYbC0mqQqZsQK1eosZOb ad/WaxT5siGUg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neratec.com Received: from mail.neratec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.neratec.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Rpmhnxuf6vxK; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.29.101.151] (CHD500279.lan.neratec.com [172.29.101.151]) by mail.neratec.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FF6CCE08F5; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: ELOed stable kernels To: Or Gerlitz , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linux Netdev List References: From: Matthias May Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 19/09/2019 16:05, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Hi Greg, > > If this is RTFM could you please point me to the Emm > > AFAIR if a stable kernel is not listed at kernel.org than it is EOL by now. > > Is this correct? > > thanks, > > Or. > You can also look at the wikipedia page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Maintenance_and_long-term_support I do the updates of the entries for each release once the release-announcement has been sent to the list. At least since I'm doing this (last ~5 years), the last release-announcement of a branch always contains a notice that this release is now EOL. I reference all these messages for each version. BR Matthias