From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, fw@strlen.de, daniel@iogearbox.net,
yuehaibing@huawei.com, zhangchangzhong@huawei.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix NULL pointer dereference in l3mdev_l3_rcv
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:02:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8da7ce4-c76c-488e-80cb-dff95bf00fe0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318143800.GA688833@kernel.org>
On 3/18/25 3:38 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:27:13AM +0800, Wang Liang wrote:
>> When delete l3s ipvlan:
>>
>> ip link del link eth0 ipvlan1 type ipvlan mode l3s
>>
>> This may cause a null pointer dereference:
>>
>> Call trace:
>> ip_rcv_finish+0x48/0xd0
>> ip_rcv+0x5c/0x100
>> __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x64/0xb0
>> __netif_receive_skb+0x20/0x80
>> process_backlog+0xb4/0x204
>> napi_poll+0xe8/0x294
>> net_rx_action+0xd8/0x22c
>> __do_softirq+0x12c/0x354
>>
>> This is because l3mdev_l3_rcv() visit dev->l3mdev_ops after
>> ipvlan_l3s_unregister() assign the dev->l3mdev_ops to NULL. The process
>> like this:
>>
>> (CPU1) | (CPU2)
>> l3mdev_l3_rcv() |
>> check dev->priv_flags: |
>> master = skb->dev; |
>> |
>> | ipvlan_l3s_unregister()
>> | set dev->priv_flags
>> | dev->l3mdev_ops = NULL;
>> |
>> visit master->l3mdev_ops |
>>
>> Add lock for dev->priv_flags and dev->l3mdev_ops is too expensive. Resolve
>> this issue by add check for master->l3mdev_ops.
>
> Hi Wang Liang,
>
> It seems to me that checking master->l3mdev_ops like this is racy.
vrf device leaves the l3mdev ops set; that is probably the better way to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-13 1:27 [PATCH net] net: fix NULL pointer dereference in l3mdev_l3_rcv Wang Liang
2025-03-18 14:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-18 15:02 ` David Ahern [this message]
2025-03-19 2:07 ` Wang Liang
2025-03-19 2:08 ` David Ahern
2025-03-20 13:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-21 8:51 ` Wang Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8da7ce4-c76c-488e-80cb-dff95bf00fe0@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).