From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A10C3A59E for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E7522D6D for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729735AbfHTLrG (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:47:06 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5163 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728283AbfHTLrG (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:47:06 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EE6B24BCADEC9E5725BD; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:47:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.133.213.239) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:46:57 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bpf: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in xsk_map_inc() To: Dan Carpenter , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= References: <20190820013652.147041-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <93fafdab-8fb3-0f2b-8f36-0cf297db3cd9@intel.com> <20190820085547.GE4451@kadam> <20190820094444.GA3964@kadam> CC: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , "Karlsson, Magnus" , Jonathan Lemon , Alexei Starovoitov , "Daniel Borkmann" , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , Netdev , bpf , From: Yuehaibing Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:46:56 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190820094444.GA3964@kadam> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.133.213.239] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2019/8/20 17:44, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:25:29AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 10:59, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: >>>> For future patches: Prefix AF_XDP socket work with "xsk:" and use "PATCH >>>> bpf-next" to let the developers know what tree you're aiming for. >>> >>> There are over 300 trees in linux-next. It impossible to try remember >>> everyone's trees. No one else has this requirement. >>> >> >> Net/bpf are different, and I wanted to point that out to lessen the >> burden for the maintainers. It's documented in: >> >> Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst. >> Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst > > Ah... I hadn't realized that BPF patches were confusing to Dave. > > I actually do keep track of net and net-next. I do quite a bit of extra > stuff for netdev patches. So what about if we used [PATCH] for bpf and > [PATCH net] and [PATCH net-next] for networking? > > I will do that. bpf-next is a good choice. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > . >