Re: [PATCH 1/2] sh_eth: fix *enum* RPADIR_BIT

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

On 6/26/2018 10:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>> The *enum*  RPADIR_BIT  was declared in the commit 86a74ff21a7a ("net:
>> sh_eth: add support for Renesas SuperH Ethernet") adding SH771x support,
>> however the SH771x manual doesn't have the RPADIR register described and,
>> moreover, tells why the padding insertion must not be used. The newer SoC
>> manuals do have RPADIR documented, though with somewhat different layout --
>> update the *enum* according to these manuals...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> 
>> --- net-next.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.h
>> +++ net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.h
>> @@ -403,8 +403,7 @@ enum DESC_I_BIT {
>>
>>   /* RPADIR */
>>   enum RPADIR_BIT {
>> -       RPADIR_PADS1 = 0x20000, RPADIR_PADS0 = 0x10000,
>> -       RPADIR_PADR = 0x0003f,
>> +       RPADIR_PADS = 0x1f0000, RPADIR_PADR = 0xffff,
> 
> Perhaps add some comments?
> 
>          RPADIR_PADS = 0x1f0000; /* Padding Size (insert N bytes of padding) */
>          RPADIR_PADR = 0xffff;   /* Padding Slot (insert padding at byte N) */

    It would be nice but inconsistent with what we do for the other registers...

>>   };
> 
> Note that none of the RPADIR enums are actually used.

    I'd surely noted that. :-)

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                          Geert
> 

MBR, Sergei