From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@marvell.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Maxim Georgiev <glipus@gmail.com>,
Emeel Hakim <ehakim@nvidia.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1] net: rework FCOE and RFS ops
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:11:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea08fe87-0a95-443f-bbd8-8db12895fd99@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213181350.1755f669@kernel.org>
On 2/13/2024 6:13 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:09:57 -0800 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> @@ -10416,14 +10416,11 @@ static const struct net_device_ops ixgbe_netdev_ops = {
>> .ndo_setup_tc = __ixgbe_setup_tc,
>> #ifdef IXGBE_FCOE
>> .ndo_select_queue = ixgbe_select_queue,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_ddp_setup = ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_get,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_ddp_target = ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_target,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_ddp_done = ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_put,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_enable = ixgbe_fcoe_enable,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_disable = ixgbe_fcoe_disable,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_get_wwn = ixgbe_fcoe_get_wwn,
>> - .ndo_fcoe_get_hbainfo = ixgbe_fcoe_get_hbainfo,
>> #endif /* IXGBE_FCOE */
>> + SET_FCOE_OPS(ixgbe_fcoe_enable, ixgbe_fcoe_disable,
>> + ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_target, ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_get,
>> + ixgbe_fcoe_ddp_put, ixgbe_fcoe_get_hbainfo)
>> + SET_FCOE_GET_WWN_OPS(ixgbe_fcoe_get_wwn)
>> .ndo_set_features = ixgbe_set_features,
>> .ndo_fix_features = ixgbe_fix_features,
>> .ndo_fdb_add = ixgbe_ndo_fdb_add,
>
> If we'd be having a vote - I personally find the #ifdef far more
> readable.
I hear you there, BUT, the gain in "no mistakes" in CONFIG_FOO={y|n|m}
compatibility is non-trivial in my mind, *and* it removes all the ifdefs
around functions and a bunch of code from the drivers with
__maybe_unused etc.
Would it be less ugly if I used something else like a macro per
function/line?
Also, I was trying to migrate this ops subsystem "to start" and then do
others, so there is a larger discussion here. The PM infra already has
this kind of mechanism (see SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(),
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(), etc.
It also allows the compiler to discard the unused functions at link time.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-10 2:09 [PATCH RFC net-next v1] net: rework FCOE and RFS ops Jesse Brandeburg
2024-02-14 2:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-16 19:11 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea08fe87-0a95-443f-bbd8-8db12895fd99@intel.com \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=aelior@marvell.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ehakim@nvidia.com \
--cc=glipus@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rajur@chelsio.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=skalluru@marvell.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).