From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
rbm@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 net-next v3] Convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in and remove stubs
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:19:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea482a29-b9bd-4365-b771-2bc03bebad3c@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317124904.552d57e4@kernel.org>
On 3/17/26 8:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:00:56 +0100 Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> Historically, the Linux kernel has supported compiling the IPv6 stack as
>> a loadable module. While this made sense in the early days of IPv6
>> adoption, modern deployments and distributions overwhelmingly either
>> build IPv6 directly into the kernel (CONFIG_IPV6=y) or disable it
>> entirely (CONFIG_IPV6=n). The modular IPv6 use-case offers image size
>> and memory savings for specific setups, this benefit is outweighed by
>> the architectural burden it imposes on the subsystems on implementation
>> and maintenance.
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> NIPA flags a few failures, still:
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pw-n=0&branch=net-next-2026-03-17--18-00&pw-n=0&pass=0
>
Hi Jakub,
This is test is applying the series in top of bpf tree which has this
commit
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/commit/972787479ee73006fddb5e59ab5c8e733810ff42
AFAICS, net-next tree do not have it yet. I do not think I can do much
about it for now. Will wait until they are merged and rebase in top of it.
Thanks,
Fernando.
> See stderr for stack trace. The BPF build issue seems to be:
>
> ../net/bpf/test_run.c:1160:8: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ipv6_bpf_stub'
> 1160 | if (!ipv6_bpf_stub) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 error generated.
> make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:289: net/bpf/test_run.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:546: net/bpf] Error 2
> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 14:00 [PATCH 00/10 net-next v3] Convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in and remove stubs Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:00 ` [PATCH 01/10 net-next v3] ipv6: convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in only and clean up Kconfigs Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-18 6:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-18 9:50 ` Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-03-18 10:14 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-18 10:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-17 14:00 ` [PATCH 02/10 net-next v3] ipv6: replace IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:00 ` [PATCH 03/10 net-next v3] ipv6: remove dynamic ICMPv6 sender registration infrastructure Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 04/10 net-next v3] ipv6: prepare headers for ipv6_stub removal Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 20:12 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-03-18 10:43 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-18 12:45 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-03-18 13:01 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 05/10 net-next v3] drivers: net: drop ipv6_stub usage and use direct function calls Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 06/10 net-next v3] ipv4: " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 07/10 net-next v3] net: convert remaining ipv6_stub users to " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 08/10 net-next v3] bpf: remove ipv6_bpf_stub completely and use " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 09/10 net-next v3] ipv6: remove ipv6_stub infrastructure completely Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 10/10 net-next v3] netfilter: remove nf_ipv6_ops and use direct function calls Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 20:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-03-18 12:18 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-17 19:49 ` [PATCH 00/10 net-next v3] Convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in and remove stubs Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-18 10:19 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera [this message]
2026-03-18 23:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 0:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-19 8:28 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea482a29-b9bd-4365-b771-2bc03bebad3c@suse.de \
--to=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rbm@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox