From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6555EC19F2D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 19:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344319AbiHITrg (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:47:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46978 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346242AbiHITqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:46:38 -0400 Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A83EE5; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wv8APvVZyD89f/M97jkVbhyYW+XM35Z6FtrwLTeI0Ng=; b=RCcB/LrzBH3G0hd3BiUTq8iPzI bGQkmpy/yNY1FfAOLo/zKygA2n+h0u0OtVZGYVbjBo+bwZ1z3xDOWn4dhHmfbrEnWp4dbjsaGSKn1 zTSJmxvK3ubwpNBG0FMa3HgAmDuvL/slxbuZckrJpQwOe7M12cgFM1XCb0J2pm/XgLelpZ4higMt3 rxOXk9brZJGlPhQhraSpYMvbt4vN+QHmV+EUpBRhzdFPKXq/rg556ge86qqn3DMn70r+10V+8NU4H jM4uIs9XAqItbSY3VrqxSXYsuN6wNkSDne3kSVbTuPFth3YMErFZHpVCnwcJREvTYoLkrn2tNn5Hz 2tbp7dTw==; Received: from [187.56.70.103] (helo=[192.168.1.60]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1oLVB3-003nDC-Fl; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:46:09 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:45:38 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering Content-Language: en-US To: Johannes Berg , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org Cc: pmladek@suse.com, bhe@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net, halves@canonical.com, fabiomirmar@gmail.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de, corbet@lwn.net, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mikelley@microsoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, jgross@suse.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org, luto@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, Anton Ivanov , Richard Weinberger References: <20220719195325.402745-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <20220719195325.402745-7-gpiccoli@igalia.com> <5bbc4296-4858-d01c-0c76-09d942377ddf@igalia.com> <54cd8c11428db4c419edf2267db00ca10da7a178.camel@sipsolutions.net> <15188cf2-a510-2725-0c6e-3c4b264714c5@igalia.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 09/08/2022 16:08, Johannes Berg wrote: > [...] >> Perfect, thank you! Let me take the opportunity to ask you something I'm >> asking all the maintainers involved here - do you prefer taking the >> patch through your tree, or to get it landed with the whole series, at >> once, from some maintainer? >> > Hm. I don't think we'd really care, but so far I was thinking - since > it's a series - it'd go through some appropriate tree all together. If > you think it should be applied separately, let us know. > > johannes For me, it would be easier if maintainers pick the patches into their -next/-fixes trees when they think the patch is good enough, but some maintainers complained that prefer the whole series approach (and some others are already taking the patches into their trees). Given that, in case you do have a linux-um tree and feel OK with that, I appreciate if you merge it, so I can remove the patch in next iteration. If you prefer the whole series approach, OK as well, your call =) Thanks, Guilherme