From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: allow busy connected flows to switch tx queues
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eba94a12-299a-46db-adf1-5f37f1b9b993@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008104612.1824200-5-edumazet@google.com>
On 10/8/25 12:46 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This is a followup of commit 726e9e8b94b9 ("tcp: refine
> skb->ooo_okay setting") and to the prior commit in this series
> ("net: control skb->ooo_okay from skb_set_owner_w()")
>
> skb->ooo_okay might never be set for bulk flows that always
> have at least one skb in a qdisc queue of NIC queue,
> especially if TX completion is delayed because of a stressed cpu.
>
> The so-called "strange attractors" has caused many performance
> issues, we need to do better.
I must admit my ignorance about the topic, do you have any reference handy?
> @@ -1984,6 +1985,14 @@ static inline int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> return __sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, nested, 1, true);
> }
>
> +/* This helper checks if a socket is a full socket,
> + * ie _not_ a timewait or request socket.
> + */
> +static inline bool sk_fullsock(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return (1 << sk->sk_state) & ~(TCPF_TIME_WAIT | TCPF_NEW_SYN_RECV);
> +}
> +
I'm possibly low on coffee, but it looks like it's not needed to move
around sk_fullsock() ?!? possibly sk_tx_queue_get() remained inline in a
previous version of the patch?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-08 10:46 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: deal with strange attractors tx queues Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 10:46 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] net: add SK_WMEM_ALLOC_BIAS constant Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 14:25 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-10-08 10:46 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/4] net: control skb->ooo_okay from skb_set_owner_w() Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 14:26 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-10-08 10:46 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/4] net: add /proc/sys/net/core/txq_reselection_ms control Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 14:27 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-10-08 15:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-08 15:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 10:46 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: allow busy connected flows to switch tx queues Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 13:38 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-10-08 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-10-08 15:30 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-10-08 16:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-10-13 9:18 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-13 9:33 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eba94a12-299a-46db-adf1-5f37f1b9b993@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).