From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: ARM BCM53573 SoC hangs/lockups caused by locks/clock/random changes
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 22:20:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec17c6c8-e697-4a5a-a705-bff24daae7b2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdahWm9aP+UasDx=s3th+vyjAfuWrKB5HS9BKEbz90ZmKw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
it's a late reply but I didn't find enough determination earlier.
On 8.09.2023 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:34 AM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm clueless at this point.
>> Maybe someone can come up with an idea of actual issue & ideally a
>> solution.
>
> Damn this is frustrating.
>
>> 2. Clock (arm,armv7-timer)
>>
>> While comparing main clock in Broadcom's SDK with upstream one I noticed
>> a tiny difference: mask value. I don't know it it makes any sense but
>> switching from CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(56) to CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64) in
>> arm_arch_timer.c (to match SDK) increases average uptime (time before a
>> hang/lockup happens) from 4 minutes to 36 minutes.
>
> This could be related to how often the system goes to idle.
>
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 1234)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 5678)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 1234)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 5678)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 1234)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 5678)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>> + if (cpu_idle_force_poll == 1234)
>> + arch_cpu_idle();
>
> Idle again.
>
> I would have tried to see what arch_cpu_idle() is doing.
>
> arm_pm_idle() or cpu_do_idle()?
In my case arm_pm_idle is NULL.
> What happens if you just put return in arch_cpu_idle()
> so it does nothing?
Doesn't help. I also tried putting:
udelay(10);
and
udelay(1000);
at the arch_cpu_idle() beginning. None helped.
Here comes more interesting experiment though. Putting there:
if (!(foo++ % 10000)) {
pr_info("[%s] arm_pm_idle:%ps\n", __func__, arm_pm_idle);
}
doesn't seem to help.
Putting following however seems to make kernel/device stable:
if (!(foo++ % 100)) {
pr_info("[%s] arm_pm_idle:%ps\n", __func__, arm_pm_idle);
}
I think I'm just going to assume those chipsets are simply hw broken.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-04 8:33 ARM BCM53573 SoC hangs/lockups caused by locks/clock/random changes Rafał Miłecki
2023-09-04 8:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-04 15:25 ` Waiman Long
2023-09-04 15:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-04 20:16 ` Waiman Long
2023-09-05 20:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-09-06 2:17 ` Waiman Long
2023-09-08 8:10 ` Linus Walleij
2023-11-29 21:20 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2023-11-29 21:33 ` Linus Walleij
2023-11-29 21:42 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec17c6c8-e697-4a5a-a705-bff24daae7b2@gmail.com \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).