From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake) qdisc Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:48:30 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20180425134249.21300-1-toke@toke.dk> <878t9b5n0q.fsf@toke.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=c3=b8iland-J=c3=b8rgensen?= , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]:33907 "EHLO mail-pg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754655AbeDYPsc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:48:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id p10so13623162pgn.1 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:48:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878t9b5n0q.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/25/2018 08:22 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Hmm, because pure ACKs are not generally aggregated (sorry, I'm not > quite clear on when exactly GSO will kick in)? A GSO packet must contain payload in each of its segment. There is no way some ack aggregation logic could build a GSO packet out of pure acks.