From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Timur Tabi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: use correct UCCE macros Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:17:04 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1231359172-6119-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, leoli@freescale.com, davem@davemloft.net, galak@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:53969 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752510AbZAGURF (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:17:05 -0500 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so7528077qwe.37 for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:17:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1231359172-6119-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > This patch will break ucc_geth.c if my other patch, "powerpc: add Ethernet > UPSMR definitions to QE library" isn't also applied. That patch is currently > in Kumar's 'next' branch, so it will make 2.6.29-rc0. Therefore, it should > be safe to apply this patch to 'net-next' today, with the understanding that > everything will be peachy once Linus pulls everyone's 2.6.29 branches. David, as I mentioned here, Kumar already has the pre-req patch in his 'next' branch (for 2.6.29), so if you apply this patch to your 'next', ucc_geth.c will break until Linus pulls from Kumar and you pull from Linus. I think that's OK. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale