From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: at803x: remove at803x_aneg_done()
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:21:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee24b531-df8b-fa3d-c7fd-8c529ecba4c8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318151712.7hmdaufxylyl33em@skbuf>
On 18.03.2021 16:17, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 03:54:00PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 18.03.2021 15:23, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> at803x_aneg_done() is pretty much dead code since the patch series
>>> "net: phy: improve and simplify phylib state machine" [1]. Remove it.
>>>
>>
>> Well, it's not dead, it's resting .. There are few places where
>> phy_aneg_done() is used. So you would need to explain:
>> - why these users can't be used with this PHY driver
>> - or why the aneg_done callback isn't needed here and the
>> genphy_aneg_done() fallback is sufficient
>
> The piece of code that Michael is removing keeps the aneg reporting as
> "not done" even when the copper-side link was reported as up, but the
> in-band autoneg has not finished.
>
> That was the _intended_ behavior when that code was introduced, and you
> have said about it:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg389193.html
>
> | That's not nice from the PHY:
> | It signals "link up", and if the system asks the PHY for link details,
> | then it sheepishly says "well, link is *almost* up".
>
> If the specification of phy_aneg_done behavior does not include in-band
> autoneg (and it doesn't), then this piece of code does not belong here.
>
> The fact that we can no longer trigger this code from phylib is yet
> another reason why it fails at its intended (and wrong) purpose and
> should be removed.
>
I don't argue against the change, I just think that the current commit
description isn't sufficient. What you just said I would have expected
in the commit description.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 14:23 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: at803x: remove at803x_aneg_done() Michael Walle
2021-03-18 14:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-03-18 15:17 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-18 16:21 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2021-03-18 16:38 ` Michael Walle
2021-03-18 17:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-18 17:09 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee24b531-df8b-fa3d-c7fd-8c529ecba4c8@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).