public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>, Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
	Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: ntb@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: ntb_netdev: Add Multi-queue support
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:20:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eeae611a-d35f-44f1-a100-50a397ae3eb4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224152809.1799199-1-den@valinux.co.jp>



On 2/24/26 8:28 AM, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ntb_netdev currently hard-codes a single NTB transport queue pair, which
> means the datapath effectively runs as a single-queue netdev regardless
> of available CPUs / parallel flows.
> 
> The longer-term motivation here is throughput scale-out: allow
> ntb_netdev to grow beyond the single-QP bottleneck and make it possible
> to spread TX/RX work across multiple queue pairs as link speeds and core
> counts keep increasing.
> 
> Multi-queue also unlocks the standard networking knobs on top of it. In
> particular, once the device exposes multiple TX queues, qdisc/tc can
> steer flows/traffic classes into different queues (via
> skb->queue_mapping), enabling per-flow/per-class scheduling and QoS in a
> familiar way.
> 
> This series is a small plumbing step towards that direction:
> 
>   1) Introduce a per-queue context object (struct ntb_netdev_queue) and
>      move queue-pair state out of struct ntb_netdev. Probe creates queue
>      pairs in a loop and configures the netdev queue counts to match the
>      number that was successfully created.
> 
>   2) Expose ntb_num_queues as a module parameter to request multiple
>      queue pairs at probe time. The value is clamped to 1..64 and kept
>      read-only for now (no runtime reconfiguration).
> 
>   3) Report the active queue-pair count via ethtool -l (get_channels),
>      so users can confirm the device configuration from user space.
> 
> Compatibility:
>   - Default remains ntb_num_queues=1, so behaviour is unchanged unless
>     the user explicitly requests more queues.
> 
> Kernel base:
>   - ntb-next latest:
>     commit 7b3302c687ca ("ntb_hw_amd: Fix incorrect debug message in link
>                           disable path")
> 
> Usage (example):
>   - modprobe ntb_netdev ntb_num_queues=<N> # Patch 2 takes care of it
>   - ethtool -l <ifname> # Patch 3 takes care of it
> 
> Patch summary:
>   1/3 net: ntb_netdev: Introduce per-queue context
>   2/3 net: ntb_netdev: Make queue pair count configurable
>   3/3 net: ntb_netdev: Expose queue pair count via ethtool -l
> 
> Testing / results:
>   Environment / command line:
>     - 2x R-Car S4 Spider boards
>       "Kernel base" (see above) + this series
>     - For TCP load:
>       [RC] $ sudo iperf3 -s
>       [EP] $ sudo iperf3 -Z -c ${SERVER_IP} -l 65480 -w 512M -P 4
>     - For UDP load:
>       [RC] $ sudo iperf3 -s
>       [EP] $ sudo iperf3 -ub0 -c ${SERVER_IP} -l 65480 -w 512M -P 4
> 
>   Before (without this series):
>       TCP / UDP : 602 Mbps / 598 Mbps
> 
>   Before (ntb_num_queues=1):
>       TCP / UDP : 588 Mbps / 605 Mbps

What accounts for the dip in TCP performance?

> 
>   After (ntb_num_queues=2):
>       TCP / UDP : 602 Mbps / 598 Mbps
> 
>   Notes:
>     In my current test environment, enabling multiple queue pairs does
>     not improve throughput. The receive-side memcpy in ntb_transport is
>     the dominant cost and limits scaling at present.
> 
>     Still, this series lays the groundwork for future scaling, for
>     example once a transport backend is introduced that avoids memcpy
>     to/from PCI memory space on both ends (see the superseded RFC
>     series:
>     https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251217151609.3162665-1-den@valinux.co.jp/).
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Koichiro
> 
> Koichiro Den (3):
>   net: ntb_netdev: Introduce per-queue context
>   net: ntb_netdev: Make queue pair count configurable
>   net: ntb_netdev: Expose queue pair count via ethtool -l
> 
>  drivers/net/ntb_netdev.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 228 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> 

for the series
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24 15:28 [PATCH 0/3] net: ntb_netdev: Add Multi-queue support Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: ntb_netdev: Introduce per-queue context Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: ntb_netdev: Make queue pair count configurable Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: ntb_netdev: Expose queue pair count via ethtool -l Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 16:20 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-02-25  3:36   ` [PATCH 0/3] net: ntb_netdev: Add Multi-queue support Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 15:07     ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-26  3:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-26  8:01   ` Koichiro Den

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eeae611a-d35f-44f1-a100-50a397ae3eb4@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox