netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: fec: use dma_alloc_noncoherent for m532x
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:44:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eedf951d-901c-40d8-91f2-0f13d33b7d4e@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009125843.GA7272@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,

On 9/10/23 22:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:29:12AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> It looks a bit odd that this ends up applying to all of Coldfire, while the
>> associated cache flush only applies to the M532x platform, which implies
>> that we'd now be relying on the non-coherent allocation actually being
>> coherent on other Coldfire platforms.
>>
>> Would it work to do something like this to make sure dma-direct does the
>> right thing on such platforms (which presumably don't have caches?), and
>> then reduce the scope of this FEC hack accordingly, to clean things up even
>> better?
> 
> Probably.  Actually Greg comment something along the lines last
> time, and mentioned something about just instruction vs instruction
> and data cache.

I just elaborated on that point a little in response to Robin's email.

>>
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
>> index b826e9c677b2..1851fa3fe077 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config COLDFIRE
>>   	select CPU_HAS_NO_BITFIELDS
>>   	select CPU_HAS_NO_CAS
>>   	select CPU_HAS_NO_MULDIV64
>> +	select DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT if !MMU && !M523x
> 
> Although it would probably make more sense to simply not select
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE and
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU for these platforms and not
> build the non-coherent code at all.  This should also include
> all coldfire platforms with mmu (M54xx/M548x/M5441x).  Then
> again for many of the coldfire platforms the Kconfig allows
> to select CACHE_WRITETHRU/CACHE_COPYBACK which looks related.
> 
> Greg, any chance you could help out with the caching modes on
> coldfire and legacy m68knommu?

Sure, yep. I am not aware that the legacy 68000 or 68328 had any caches
at all.

The cache modes change a bit through out the various ColdFire family series, but
can be broken down roughly into 2 groups.

1.  Version 2 cores (so everything named 52xx). Early members (5206, 5206e, 5272)
     had instruction cache only. Later members (5208, 5271/5275, 523x, etc) had
     a selectable instruction or data or both cache arrangement. Kconfig lets you
     select which you want - the default is instruction cache only.

2.  Version 3 and 4 cores (so everything named 53xx and 54xx). They have a unified
     instruction and data cache. Data caching can be selected to be write-through
     (the default) or write-back.

Some of the version 4 cores also have an MMU.

The M532x hack in the fec driver is to deal with its unified cache, and it is the
only ColdFire version 3 or 4 SoC that has the fec hardware module (thus no others
listed out there). I suspect if you select data cache on the version 2 cores that have
it would break in the fec driver too.

Regards
Greg



  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-10 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09  7:41 fix the non-coherent coldfire dma_alloc_coherent Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dma-direct: add depdenencies to CONFIG_DMA_GLOBAL_POOL Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  8:43   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09  9:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  9:34       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09  9:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  9:51           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 10:04             ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09 11:10               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09 12:48                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 16:45                   ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dma-direct: add a CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ALLOC symbol Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] dma-direct: simplify the use atomic pool logic in dma_direct_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] dma-direct: warn when coherent allocations aren't supported Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] net: fec: use dma_alloc_noncoherent for m532x Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09 10:29   ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-09 12:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-10 14:44       ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2023-10-16  9:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-17  8:31           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-10 14:20     ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-11  5:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-11 13:09         ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-11 18:21           ` Michael Schmitz
2023-10-12 13:25             ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-12 14:00               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-13  1:48                 ` Greg Ungerer
2023-10-12 19:18               ` Michael Schmitz
2023-10-09  7:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] m68k: don't provide arch_dma_alloc for nommu/coldfire Christoph Hellwig
2023-10-09  8:39 ` fix the non-coherent coldfire dma_alloc_coherent Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-10-09  9:15   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eedf951d-901c-40d8-91f2-0f13d33b7d4e@linux-m68k.org \
    --to=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).