From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Matthieu CASTET" Subject: Re: softmac mtu Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:48552 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751522AbWIYTUW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:20:22 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GRvzo-0007Ea-6J for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:20:04 +0200 Received: from cac94-1-81-57-151-96.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.151.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:20:03 +0200 Received: from castet.matthieu by cac94-1-81-57-151-96.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:20:03 +0200 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org So why a special mtu handler is not implemented in 802.11 stack : - 802.11 stack doesn't support bigger packet - 802.11 stack doesn't support very bigger packet (with 802.11 fragmentation) - 802.11 writers were lazy Matthieu