netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kosta Todorovic <kostodo@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, tulip-users@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:45:30 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efe3b00605060222452675d8fc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428E0B3B.1090507@candelatech.com>

I'm not too concerned with backward compatibility. I see silicom-usa
provide both a Broadcom and Intel based chipsets.
 
Is there any reason in particular that you reccomended Broadcom? And
can standard kernel drivers be used for these cards? I've had bad
expirience with custom manufactorer drivers once they discontinue
development and support for their card.

How reliable is Silicom-usa?

As a management decision, who would you purchase 10 quad port cards
from and which kinds of cards would u get?


Thanks,
K

On 5/20/05, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> Kosta Todorovic wrote:
> > 2 more questions:
> >
> > 1) Is there anything special I will need to compile in terms of the
> > linux kernel for 64-bit PCI bus mode (PCI-X) ? (Currently I'm using
> > kernel 2.4.x but that is because my current card drivers do not
> > support 2.6.x)
> 
> Nothing special...2.4 and 2.6 kernels since way back will work just fine.
> 
> > 2) The machine actually has a PCI extension with 9 other PCI-X slots.
> > The current cards are 64-bit (pci-x) but as a test i'm planning on
> > replacing them with DLinks DFE-580tx's. Unfortunately these are 32-bit
> > cards (legacy pci). How will these 4 ports work in 32-bit mode? What
> > will the effect be on the speed?
> 
> If you put a 33Mhz NIC in a PCI-X bus it makes the entire bus run at
> 33Mhz speed.
> 
> If you do want full backwards compatibility, get the 'universal' 4-port
> broadcom NIC from silicom-usa.  It works fine in 32-bit PCI busses, and
> though I haven't personally tested it, it should work fine in PCI-X
> busses at high speed as well.
> 
> Ben
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/19/05, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Kosta Todorovic wrote:
> >>
> >>>Whats the best 4-port NIC currently available? I'm interested in
> >>>purchasing 10 4-port NICs as a replacement for my current cards.
> >>>
> >>>I am looking for 10/100Mbps and a good driver for linux (2.4.x and
> >>>2.6.x). Preferably a mainstream company but thats not priority.
> >>>
> >>>Could the community please recommend the best card available? Money is
> >>>not an issue since im really interested in the best of the best.
> >>
> >>Get an Intel 4-port GigE NIC.  It will do 10/100/1000, and if you really
> >>want to use all 4 ports at even 100Mbps, you need the 64-bit PCI bus...
> >>
> >>I have been getting mine from silicom-usa.com lately.  They also have
> >>6-port NICs, and 4-port broadcom GigE nics that can be used in 32-bit
> >>PCI slots.  (The Intel 4-port NICs will only work in 64-bit PCI slots.)
> >>
> >>If you really want 10/100 nics, try the p430tx from aei:
> >>http://www.aei-it.com/hardware/fastenet/p430tx.htm
> >>
> >>These are like the old DFE570tx NICs, and use the tulip driver.  They
> >>are almost as expensive as the GigE NICs though...
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Ben
> >>
> >>
> >>>Any suggestions?
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Kosta
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 3/11/05, Kosta Todorovic <kostodo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>My company has recently purchased several ZNYX ZX274 network cards.
> >>>>These cards are Four Channel, 10/100 PCI Adapters. They use Intel chipsets.
> >>>>
> >>>>Unfortunately there exists no drivers for linux amd64 architecture.
> >>>>There are 32bit drivers found at:
> >>>>http://www.znyx.com/support/drivers/ZX374_drivers.htm but naturally
> >>>>they wont compile under my amd64 system.
> >>>>
> >>>>The driver itself is called znb.o and can be downloaded from ZNYX's
> >>>>website. I spoke to support staff there but they told me they have
> >>>>discontinued support and development for this series of cards.
> >>>>
> >>>>The system I am running gentoo and have tried both 2.4.x and 2.6.x
> >>>>kernels but no luck.
> >>>>
> >>>>Unfortunately there is NO 64bit drivers available for ANY platform. not even MS.
> >>>>
> >>>>Does anyone know of a customised znb.o driver built for amd64?
> >>>>Is there any chance of anyone modifying the source code of the driver
> >>>>to compile under a amd64 system?
> >>>>
> >>>>I've noticed that "tulip" drivers get loaded as a module at boot time.
> >>>>but they dont function correctly. (lets you start the device and
> >>>>attach ips but cant talk through it)
> >>>>
> >>>>Is there any variants of the tulip driver that will work for this?
> >>>>
> >>>>Help much appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>/proc/pci extract for network cards:
> >>>>
> >>>> Bus  5, device   5, function  0:
> >>>>   Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
> >>>>21142/43 (#30) (rev 65).
> >>>>     IRQ 30.
> >>>>     Master Capable.  Latency=128.  Min Gnt=20.Max Lat=40.
> >>>>     I/O at 0x0 [0x7f].
> >>>>     Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xfa1ff400 [0xfa1ff7ff].
> >>>> Bus  5, device   4, function  0:
> >>>>   Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
> >>>>21142/43 (#29) (rev 65).
> >>>>     IRQ 29.
> >>>>     Master Capable.  No bursts.  Min Gnt=20.Max Lat=40.
> >>>>     I/O at 0x0 [0x7f].
> >>>>     Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9f00000 [0xf9f003ff].
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> >>Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> 
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-03  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-11  5:51 Network card driver problem (znb.o/tulip) Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-11  6:00 ` Ben Greear
2005-03-11  6:08   ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-19  5:33   ` Jon Mason
2005-03-19 10:29     ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-19 13:57       ` Jon Mason
2005-03-19 15:23         ` Francois Romieu
2005-03-20 14:05           ` jamal
2005-03-20 19:02             ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-20 19:09               ` jamal
2005-03-20 19:18                 ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-20 19:29                   ` jamal
2005-03-20 19:36                     ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-20 19:38                       ` jamal
2005-03-22  1:59                     ` Jon Mason
2005-03-22  7:18                       ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-03-22 14:56                         ` jamal
2005-05-19  8:02 ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-05-19 17:14   ` Ben Greear
2005-05-20  5:25     ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-05-20 16:07       ` Ben Greear
2005-06-03  5:45         ` Kosta Todorovic [this message]
2005-06-03  5:53           ` Ben Greear
2005-06-03  5:58             ` Kosta Todorovic
2005-06-03  6:25               ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efe3b00605060222452675d8fc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kostodo@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=tulip-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).