From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2431FC0007A for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4413207AE for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731081AbgLCPxv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:53:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53132 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731074AbgLCPxu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:53:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7185C061A52 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 07:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id t18so2176026otk.2 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 07:53:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t+MHhpR3MUZs/FfNVU/5dfimiVU/ToUCwwwcpj4hCug=; b=HpP0EXSCKYMwSWNnloCY8VCWjcHGOcxK/xG2ovUV1+zYLRwTr2XvEE2t/zNpUY7vii 1tAcIdIlC8b9CoRGsLbHf1d7+H/AFC4RZt0z04P4h9bdTAZfNAAsIkm6D1EtITJ0hIjH qMuKQcBAURGjG0pjoErrOUlgWAhlE+FmvPte/94+gOjMm6bXinMnfRWHO3fcvW56fB/+ t/sJxhUxPICt9rkwcCf4DN1KAc5TJ7DEnG9MmUgEDKV7C2pGF6Tc0cKzMqRBAJwJHUkS YQVDmG6jQvhODA6900M22Q48VLlcfYcTA1PWHxh/mfVNEty0ENPgwqVsA0BXedWa3/VH nv1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t+MHhpR3MUZs/FfNVU/5dfimiVU/ToUCwwwcpj4hCug=; b=DOwN02P9XR0u8gTDdprZD3THpwGriW8sEA0jqaswDHx2daHm+U2vvOEoyXLkJGd1Co 99gnrgzyjptnwbpLHc4DX9HzhixyZIlrNwbgpYLnhWkl1IFMkKgAVZXNC7vtskKTfKaY Al0Pj+zArflepBhe4kHTGnRxoL5QLh7GgjynI9y5WICBdcWPWSbmbV3ei1PCtK9/6xDw 9QBQk7cJ6Tw7W1+ZTdDRM7aNYCExmT1VaMFE8UFiWP05rnGe1b/xGnYsORZeDmdHbDht ekt+nTH3FE29bLH8ucBFR+PhXLI2zZ+i/7B1cmKPm46RRNWUgkjzo/pxknHqfporVGDZ VkmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BK/IHGcGOIVu2EbdD6Am8lG2m1/deIKbWlM+4wSvy0JlAQgSC 1tF5H0MTExUWUeCy7tZriJ6NMO526yo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAAqo8J+IbDQDv+RppIOh69M9ot1IE0rCuui7aHrZqeZHeCvBzthFAC4u050XlmN4ZiMiqqA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4806:: with SMTP id c6mr2516988otf.66.1607010790073; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 07:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local ([8.48.134.51]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 186sm287883oof.16.2020.12.03.07.53.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 07:53:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: VRF NS for lladdr sent on the wrong interface To: Stephen Suryaputra Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20201124002345.GA42222@ubuntu> <20201201190055.GA16436@ICIPI.localdomain> <70557d4f-cf35-ddba-391c-c66aa8ca242a@gmail.com> <20201203130109.GA26743@vmserver> From: David Ahern Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:53:08 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203130109.GA26743@vmserver> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 12/3/20 6:01 AM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote: > The tests in fcnal-test.sh passed. There are two failures that are > expected, I think. Attached is the output. I'll take a look at the failures. > > If you agree that my patch is the right solution, I can send the patch > out for review. I think so, just trying to understand why that change was not needed until now. Go ahead a send as a proper patch. Please add the commands for this use case to fcnal-test.sh. There is a catch-all 'use_cases' section. You can add it as a another one. Do the ping in both directions after initial configuration and again after cycling the netdev -- shows success after the route table re-ordering.