From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta1.migadu.com (out-170.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FB838B986 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 22:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770245065; cv=none; b=EbPj6KzG21xPJ2Eamr1JRkFuabv/duNArxTYtfS/BFqBO1z610UMFHxpe8qTuq+MOVWjDu3OQUHBfJWRmivqd5OdPNgbmcBnBAMOBSIz6d1DmxUPNOXniGygNq0x+CwucsdTqxHM53K/RNw7N/LntSRRJKt7sxUHDbH8apWZfuw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770245065; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oRv8IAXE2m2eev4ZylxxZFrc5LS8Dd1TT9UnZ1lCPaQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Z4XXysteXdhVwXOQiKfUpeqDLpjzcFxpMOcVSHVR5oyqiJDG9z4r4DM/qhGOv8HQNgbi8JN/+zOrlwCWZVRqSM0xJNBpfs0GQrUtPO0eCJ4IKFORfEgHR5TnX1M3s18E/9FXZGRzDXtGZIBwNJ+khhroBwY1Ok6QucaKghj8OSs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=mDPzL3+A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="mDPzL3+A" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1770245062; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qSUw9bwce56DZz1u0SBYzca0iWcxiBGlQ0CXcrp4AYI=; b=mDPzL3+A/l8YA/8AOIjYxDOpOrMvFbzLLt4BD/BscIZoPJPl8fLn7lD9vjLJ0O1y3VBBda kTPKWCzlXm2iLMwKgFgB2GdV8a/VLew+98xf+55kK6ORiOXPbM7cXSv0kLSLn07SdxTxxT 7WT4SdYQEAu7HGPZMLcxCuhZVDVBKGY= Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:44:18 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Misc changes around AF_UNIX. To: Kuniyuki Iwashima Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Network Development References: <20260203213442.682838-1-kuniyu@google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Martin KaFai Lau In-Reply-To: <20260203213442.682838-1-kuniyu@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 2/3/26 1:30 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > Patch 1 adapts sk_is_XXX() helpers in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(). > Patch 2 removes an unnecessary sk_fullsock() in bpf_skc_to_unix_sock(). > > > Kuniyuki Iwashima (2): > bpf: Use sk_is_inet() and sk_is_unix() in > __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(). > bpf: Don't check sk_fullsock() in bpf_skc_to_unix_sock(). > > kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 6 +----- > net/core/filter.c | 2 +- The bot is slow. The change in filter.c is small and the cycle is closing, so I have landed them to the bpf_next/master. I just noticed the netdev list is not in cc, so added it here also.