From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] ip: factor out protocol delivery helper
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:30:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0e1b65b81a2cc3d1459599f668719ac4b72a11e.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482631991107b8493fe7310c01d66b92@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 00:35 -0600, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
wrote:
> On 2018-10-30 11:24, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > So that we can re-use it at the UDP lavel in a later patch
> >
>
> Hi Paolo
>
> Minor queries -
> Should it be "level" instead of "lavel"? Similar comment for the ipv6
> patch as well.
Indeed. Will fix in the next iteration.
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > index 35a786c0aaa0..72250b4e466d 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > @@ -188,51 +188,50 @@ bool ip_call_ra_chain(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > -static int ip_local_deliver_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> > struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > int protocol)
>
> Would it be better if this function was declared in include/net/ip.h &
> include/net/ipv6.h rather than in net/ipv4/udp.c & net/ipv6/udp.c as in
> the patch "udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection"
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
> index 72593e1..3d7fdb4 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip.h
> @@ -717,4 +717,6 @@ static inline void ip_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> int rtm_getroute_parse_ip_proto(struct nlattr *attr, u8 *ip_proto,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>
> +void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
> proto);
> +
> #endif /* _IP_H */
> diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
> index 8296505..4d4d2cfe 100644
> --- a/include/net/ipv6.h
> +++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
> @@ -1101,4 +1101,8 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join_ssm(struct sock *sk, int
> ifindex,
> const struct in6_addr *addr, unsigned int
> mode);
> int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
> const struct in6_addr *addr);
> +
> +void ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
> nexthdr,
> + bool have_final);
> +
> #endif /* _NET_IPV6_H */
>
Agreed, I will do in the next iteration.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-02 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 17:24 [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] udp: implement GRO support Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/10] udp: implement complete book-keeping for encap_needed Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 20:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-02 13:30 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/10] udp: implement GRO for plain UDP sockets Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/10] udp: add support for UDP_GRO cmsg Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/10] ip: factor out protocol delivery helper Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 6:35 ` Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
2018-11-02 13:30 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/10] ipv6: " Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/10] udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection Paolo Abeni
2018-10-31 9:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 21:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-02 13:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/10] selftests: add GRO support to udp bench rx program Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/10] selftests: conditionally enable XDP support in udpgso_bench_rx Paolo Abeni
2018-11-01 21:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/10] selftests: add some benchmark for UDP GRO Paolo Abeni
2018-10-30 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/10] selftests: add functionals test " Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0e1b65b81a2cc3d1459599f668719ac4b72a11e.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).