From: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@01019freenet.de>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio - bisected
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:56:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0f959dc-9c6f-c82b-b245-4aedf057e992@01019freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f75bdf5-839b-8c84-c8be-e83d071b245e@maya.org>
On 12/18/2017 at 06:11 PM Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 at 11:33 PM Willem de Bruijn wrote:
[...]
>> I have been able to reproduce the hang by sending a UFO packet
>> between two guests running v4.13 on a host running v4.15-rc1.
>>
>> The vhost_net_ubuf_ref refcount indeed hits overflow (-1) from
>> vhost_zerocopy_callback being called for each segment of a
>> segmented UFO skb. This refcount is decremented then on each
>> segment, but incremented only once for the entire UFO skb.
>>
>> Before v4.14, these packets would be converted in skb_segment to
>> regular copy packets with skb_orphan_frags and the callback function
>> called once at this point. v4.14 added support for reference counted
>> zerocopy skb that can pass through skb_orphan_frags unmodified and
>> have their zerocopy state safely cloned with skb_zerocopy_clone.
>>
>> The call to skb_zerocopy_clone must come after skb_orphan_frags
>> to limit cloning of this state to those skbs that can do so safely.
>>
>> Please try a host with the following patch. This fixes it for me. I intend to
>> send it to net.
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index a592ca025fc4..d2d985418819 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -3654,8 +3654,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>
>> skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |= skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
>> SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
>> - if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> - goto err;
>>
>> while (pos < offset + len) {
>> if (i >= nfrags) {
>> @@ -3681,6 +3679,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>
>> if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC)))
>> goto err;
>> + if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> + goto err;
>>
>> *nskb_frag = *frag;
>> __skb_frag_ref(nskb_frag);
>>
>>
>> This is relatively inefficient, as it calls skb_zerocopy_clone for each frag
>> in the frags[] array. I will follow-up with a patch to net-next that only
>> checks once per skb:
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 466581cf4cdc..a293a33604ec 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -3662,7 +3662,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>
>> skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |= skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
>> SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
>> - if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> + if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
>> + skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> goto err;
>>
>> while (pos < offset + len) {
>> @@ -3676,6 +3677,11 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>>
>> BUG_ON(!nfrags);
>>
>> + if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
>> + skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
>> + GFP_ATOMIC))
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> list_skb = list_skb->next;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3687,9 +3693,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> - if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC)))
>> - goto err;
>> -
>
> I'm currently testing this one.
>
Test is in progress. I'm testing w/ 4.14.7, which already contains "net:
accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet".
At first, I tested an unpatched 4.14.7 - the problem (no more killable
qemu-process) did occur promptly on shutdown of the machine. This was
expected.
Next, I applied the above patch (the second one). Until now, I didn't
face any problem any more on shutdown of VMs. Looks promising.
Thanks,
regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 14:17 Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio - bisected Andreas Hartmann
2017-11-27 16:46 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-11-27 16:55 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-11-27 19:09 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-01 10:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-03 11:35 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-04 16:28 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-05 3:50 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-05 16:23 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-06 3:08 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-08 7:21 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-08 8:47 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-12-08 10:31 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-08 11:40 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-12-08 12:45 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-08 12:58 ` Michal Kubecek
2017-12-08 13:13 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-08 15:11 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-08 16:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-08 20:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-08 20:44 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-11 15:54 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-14 16:31 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-14 22:17 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-14 22:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-15 6:05 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-17 22:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-18 17:11 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-20 15:56 ` Andreas Hartmann [this message]
2017-12-20 22:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-21 17:05 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-21 17:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-24 16:24 ` Andreas Hartmann
2017-12-24 18:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0f959dc-9c6f-c82b-b245-4aedf057e992@01019freenet.de \
--to=andihartmann@01019freenet.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).