From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Zinc Lim <limzhineng2@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zinclim@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] eth: fbnic: fix race between concurrent hwmon sensor reads
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 23:56:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2ecb668-ec56-4c84-ac97-474a2d761005@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0673af7d-51a6-484c-be38-3f46849ebb30@lunn.ch>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:51:29PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 01:05:14PM -0700, Zinc Lim wrote:
> > From: Zinc Lim <limzhineng2@gmail.com>
> >
> > Reading an hwmon sensor
>
> Since this is a hwmon related patch, it is a good idea to Cc: the
> hwmon Maintainer.
>
> I don't know hwmon too well, i've never had to look at locking, but...
>
> static int hwmon_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> {
> struct hwmon_thermal_data *tdata = thermal_zone_device_priv(tz);
> struct hwmon_device *hwdev = to_hwmon_device(tdata->dev);
> int ret;
> long t;
>
> guard(mutex)(&hwdev->lock);
>
> ret = hwdev->chip->ops->read(tdata->dev, hwmon_temp, hwmon_temp_input,
> tdata->index, &t);
>
> Could you explain why this lock in the hwmon core is not sufficient?
> It could be i'm reading it wrong, but it looks like the lock is shared
> by all hwmon instanced registered by a
> hwmon_device_register_with_info() call.
Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst
When using ``[devm_]hwmon_device_register_with_info()`` to register the
hardware monitoring device, accesses using the associated access functions
are serialised by the hardware monitoring core. If a driver needs locking
for other functions such as interrupt handlers or for attributes which are
fully implemented in the driver, hwmon_lock() and hwmon_unlock() can be used
to ensure that calls to those functions are serialized.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 20:05 [PATCH net] eth: fbnic: fix race between concurrent hwmon sensor reads Zinc Lim
2026-06-24 21:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-24 21:56 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2026-06-24 22:22 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2ecb668-ec56-4c84-ac97-474a2d761005@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=limzhineng2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=zinclim@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox