From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests: fib_tests: Add test cases for route lookup with oif
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 10:59:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2ece8a4-1eaf-45c6-8861-27042d275b92@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224161801.824589-2-idosch@nvidia.com>
On 12/24/25 9:18 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Test that both address families respect the oif parameter when a
> matching multipath route is found, regardless of the presence of a
> source address.
>
> Output without "ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally
> generated traffic":
>
> # ./fib_tests.sh -t "ipv4_mpath_oif ipv6_mpath_oif"
>
> IPv4 multipath oif test
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via first nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via second nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via first nexthop with source address [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via second nexthop with source address [ OK ]
>
> IPv6 multipath oif test
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via first nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via second nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via first nexthop with source address [FAIL]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via second nexthop with source address [FAIL]
>
> Tests passed: 6
> Tests failed: 2
>
> Output with "ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally generated
> traffic":
>
> # ./fib_tests.sh -t "ipv4_mpath_oif ipv6_mpath_oif"
>
> IPv4 multipath oif test
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via first nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via second nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via first nexthop with source address [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv4 multipath via second nexthop with source address [ OK ]
>
> IPv6 multipath oif test
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via first nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via second nexthop [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via first nexthop with source address [ OK ]
> TEST: IPv6 multipath via second nexthop with source address [ OK ]
>
> Tests passed: 8
> Tests failed: 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> index a88f797c549a..8ae0adbcafe9 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ TESTS="unregister down carrier nexthop suppress ipv6_notify ipv4_notify \
> ipv4_route_metrics ipv4_route_v6_gw rp_filter ipv4_del_addr \
> ipv6_del_addr ipv4_mangle ipv6_mangle ipv4_bcast_neigh fib6_gc_test \
> ipv4_mpath_list ipv6_mpath_list ipv4_mpath_balance ipv6_mpath_balance \
> - fib6_ra_to_static"
> + ipv4_mpath_oif ipv6_mpath_oif fib6_ra_to_static"
>
> VERBOSE=0
> PAUSE_ON_FAIL=no
> @@ -2776,6 +2776,110 @@ ipv6_mpath_balance_test()
> forwarding_cleanup
> }
>
> +ipv4_mpath_oif_test_common()
> +{
> + local get_param=$1; shift
> + local expected_oif=$1; shift
> + local test_name=$1; shift
> + local tmp_file
> +
> + tmp_file=$(mktemp)
> +
> + for i in {1..100}; do
> + $IP route get 203.0.113.${i} $get_param >> "$tmp_file"
> + done
> +
> + [[ $(grep "$expected_oif" "$tmp_file" | wc -l) -eq 100 ]]
> + log_test $? 0 "$test_name"
> +
> + rm "$tmp_file"
> +}
> +
> +ipv4_mpath_oif_test()
> +{
> + echo
> + echo "IPv4 multipath oif test"
> +
> + setup
> +
> + set -e
> + $IP link add dummy1 type dummy
> + $IP link set dev dummy1 up
> + $IP address add 192.0.2.1/28 dev dummy1
> + $IP address add 192.0.2.17/32 dev lo
> +
> + $IP route add 203.0.113.0/24 \
> + nexthop via 198.51.100.2 dev dummy0 \
> + nexthop via 192.0.2.2 dev dummy1
> + set +e
> +
> + ipv4_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy0" "dummy0" \
> + "IPv4 multipath via first nexthop"
> +
> + ipv4_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy1" "dummy1" \
> + "IPv4 multipath via second nexthop"
> +
> + ipv4_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy0 from 192.0.2.17" "dummy0" \
> + "IPv4 multipath via first nexthop with source address"
> +
> + ipv4_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy1 from 192.0.2.17" "dummy1" \
> + "IPv4 multipath via second nexthop with source address"
> +
> + cleanup
> +}
> +
> +ipv6_mpath_oif_test_common()
> +{
> + local get_param=$1; shift
> + local expected_oif=$1; shift
> + local test_name=$1; shift
> + local tmp_file
> +
> + tmp_file=$(mktemp)
> +
> + for i in {1..100}; do
> + $IP route get 2001:db8:10::${i} $get_param >> "$tmp_file"
> + done
> +
> + [[ $(grep "$expected_oif" "$tmp_file" | wc -l) -eq 100 ]]
> + log_test $? 0 "$test_name"
> +
> + rm "$tmp_file"
> +}
> +
> +ipv6_mpath_oif_test()
> +{
> + echo
> + echo "IPv6 multipath oif test"
> +
> + setup
> +
> + set -e
> + $IP link add dummy1 type dummy
> + $IP link set dev dummy1 up
> + $IP address add 2001:db8:2::1/64 dev dummy1
> + $IP address add 2001:db8:100::1/128 dev lo
> +
> + $IP route add 2001:db8:10::/64 \
> + nexthop via 2001:db8:1::2 dev dummy0 \
> + nexthop via 2001:db8:2::2 dev dummy1
> + set +e
> +
> + ipv6_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy0" "dummy0" \
> + "IPv6 multipath via first nexthop"
> +
> + ipv6_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy1" "dummy1" \
> + "IPv6 multipath via second nexthop"
> +
> + ipv6_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy0 from 2001:db8:100::1" "dummy0" \
> + "IPv6 multipath via first nexthop with source address"
> +
> + ipv6_mpath_oif_test_common "oif dummy1 from 2001:db8:100::1" "dummy1" \
> + "IPv6 multipath via second nexthop with source address"
> +
> + cleanup
> +}
> +
> ################################################################################
> # usage
>
> @@ -2861,6 +2965,8 @@ do
> ipv6_mpath_list) ipv6_mpath_list_test;;
> ipv4_mpath_balance) ipv4_mpath_balance_test;;
> ipv6_mpath_balance) ipv6_mpath_balance_test;;
> + ipv4_mpath_oif) ipv4_mpath_oif_test;;
> + ipv6_mpath_oif) ipv6_mpath_oif_test;;
> fib6_ra_to_static) fib6_ra_to_static;;
>
> help) echo "Test names: $TESTS"; exit 0;;
if VRF versions of the test also pass, I am good with the proposed change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 16:18 [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally generated traffic Ido Schimmel
2025-12-24 16:18 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests: fib_tests: Add test cases for route lookup with oif Ido Schimmel
2026-01-06 17:59 ` David Ahern [this message]
2026-01-07 12:51 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2ece8a4-1eaf-45c6-8861-27042d275b92@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox