From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@gmail.com>,
Paul Greenwalt <paul.greenwalt@intel.com>,
"Dave Ertman" <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix infinite recursion in ice_cfg_tx_topo via ice_init_dev_hw
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:22:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f30ad78e-1eb9-4c9d-9034-c8873966de66@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415163003.GP772670@horms.kernel.org>
On 4/15/2026 9:30 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 09:14:20PM +0200, Petr Oros wrote:
>> On certain E810 configurations where firmware supports Tx scheduler
>> topology switching (tx_sched_topo_comp_mode_en), ice_cfg_tx_topo()
>> may need to apply a new 5-layer or 9-layer topology from the DDP
>> package. If the AQ command to set the topology fails (e.g. due to
>> invalid DDP data or firmware limitations), the global configuration
>> lock must still be cleared via a CORER reset.
>>
>> Commit 86aae43f21cf ("ice: don't leave device non-functional if Tx
>> scheduler config fails") correctly fixed this by refactoring
>> ice_cfg_tx_topo() to always trigger CORER after acquiring the global
>> lock and re-initialize hardware via ice_init_hw() afterwards.
>>
>> However, commit 8a37f9e2ff40 ("ice: move ice_deinit_dev() to the end
>> of deinit paths") later moved ice_init_dev_hw() into ice_init_hw(),
>> breaking the reinit path introduced by 86aae43f21cf. This creates an
>> infinite recursive call chain:
>>
>> ice_init_hw()
>> ice_init_dev_hw()
>> ice_cfg_tx_topo() # topology change needed
>> ice_deinit_hw()
>> ice_init_hw() # reinit after CORER
>> ice_init_dev_hw() # recurse
>> ice_cfg_tx_topo()
>> ... # stack overflow
>>
>> Fix by moving ice_init_dev_hw() back out of ice_init_hw() and calling
>> it explicitly from ice_probe() and ice_devlink_reinit_up(). The third
>> caller, ice_cfg_tx_topo(), intentionally does not need ice_init_dev_hw()
>> during its reinit, it only needs the core HW reinitialization. This
>> breaks the recursion cleanly without adding flags or guards.
>>
>> The deinit ordering changes from commit 8a37f9e2ff40 ("ice: move
>> ice_deinit_dev() to the end of deinit paths") which fixed slow rmmod
>> are preserved, only the init-side placement of ice_init_dev_hw() is
>> reverted.
>>
>> Fixes: 8a37f9e2ff40 ("ice: move ice_deinit_dev() to the end of deinit paths")
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> I don't intended to delay this patch.
> But could you follow-up by looking over the AI generated
> review of this patch on sashiko.dev?
>
> Thanks!
I'll take a look as well. I recently included this fix in Intel Wired
LAN update last night, so hopefully nothing too problematic...
Sashiko says:
> While this code wasn't introduced by this patch, the restructuring makes it
> more visible: can this cause a use-after-free if the nested hardware
> initialization fails?
> If ice_cfg_tx_topo() triggers a topology change, it performs a CORER reset
> followed by an unroll (ice_deinit_hw) and re-initialization (ice_init_hw). If
> that nested ice_init_hw() fails, its unroll path frees hw->port_info and
> destroys control queues and mutexes.
> Because ice_init_dev_hw() returns void, it swallows the -ENODEV error and
> falls back to safe mode. This allows ice_probe() to proceed with an unrolled
> and freed hardware struct, which would result in a use-after-free when memory
> like hw->port_info is accessed later.
> Should ice_init_dev_hw() be updated to return an error code so the caller can
> abort the probe when base hardware unrolls occur?
I think this suggestion might be good. We fail in probe if ice_init_hw()
fails regardless of "safe" mode, so having init_dev_hw() also fail if
the reinit fails makes some sense to me...
Thanks,
Jake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 19:14 [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix infinite recursion in ice_cfg_tx_topo via ice_init_dev_hw Petr Oros
2026-04-13 21:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2026-04-13 23:43 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-14 8:43 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-15 16:30 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-15 21:22 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
2026-04-15 21:23 ` Jacob Keller
2026-04-16 4:36 ` Przemek Kitszel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f30ad78e-1eb9-4c9d-9034-c8873966de66@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox