From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Misaligned IPv6 addresses is SCTP socket options.
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:50:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f380b70f54854d98a9c801c7ae6bc370@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
Several of the structures in linux/uapi/linux/sctp.h are
marked __attribute__((packed, aligned(4))).
I believe this was done so that the UAPI structure was the
same on both 32 and 64bit systems.
The 'natural' alignment is that of 'u64' - so would differ
between 32 and 64 bit x86 cpus.
There are two horrible issues here:
1) I believe the natural alignment of u64 is actually 8
bytes on some 32bit architectures.
So the change would have broken binary compatibility
for 32bit applications compiled before the alignment
was added.
2) Inside the kernel the address of the structure member
is 'blindly' passed through as if it were an aligned
pointer.
For instance I'm pretty sure is can get passed to
inet_addr_is_any() (in net/core/utils.).
Here it gets passed to memcmp().
gcc will inline the memcmp() and almost certainly use 64bit
accesses.
These will fault on architectures (like sparc64).
No amount of casting can make gcc 'forget' the alignment
of a structure.
Passing to an external function as 'void *' will - but
even the LTO could track the alignment through.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 15:50 David Laight [this message]
2020-07-21 2:55 ` Misaligned IPv6 addresses is SCTP socket options Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-07-21 8:32 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f380b70f54854d98a9c801c7ae6bc370@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).