From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Torgue Subject: Re: stmmac driver... Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:49:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20161207.130654.1484281922991494182.davem@davemloft.net> <20161208.102552.714315690167693892.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:48103 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753957AbcLHPtq (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:49:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161208.102552.714315690167693892.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/08/2016 04:25 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexandre Torgue > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:55:04 +0100 > >> Maybe I forget some series. Do you have others in mind ? > > Please see the thread titled: > > "net: ethernet: Initial driver for Synopsys DWC XLGMAC" > > which seems to be discussing consolidation of various drivers > for the same IP core, of which stmmac is one. > > I personally am against any change of the driver name and > things like this, and wish the people doing that work would > simply contribute to making whatever changes they need directly > to the stmmac driver. > > You really need to voice your opinion when major changes are being > proposed for the driver you maintain. For sure I agree. I miss this one as it doesn't modify (yet) stmmac driver. I gonna respond to the thread; Regards Alex >