From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E6B292B2E; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751883148; cv=none; b=ayZYMINWuWkTyenhZe2h7E5VgtGeCQGAzWn2/DihB3alvtz5nzr89s75lEg+aUNaGyawkYe8/Y2yuKoiTL1vQcjlXtufheJrXWEheF+N0fyjY4bPziAn2sX0OpC8DaGSXL80b0NvutbyjZ5IH9VTzkYIsL2menS7Jn0qjqO5m5M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751883148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r0u0KcLgNzqStPxSo8tNTI+lkrR1NVJwDZIEcjacuXA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ED/la9kvfvfXguueckJ34F8lAwIw/01yNRr9mSC48FPce4zhPJvdjCESdrBltpFxjYIAkYOmD3nOFcR+EC3nMZJZDV8q3ZaT0hGzet5IdFCpVcsQUwp/zsXB0pdY07c+r7qUwKTTataHc8/RWHUqaf+4xcezcxj16BlCQmJOSxU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=n9KLjXG5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="n9KLjXG5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1751883145; bh=r0u0KcLgNzqStPxSo8tNTI+lkrR1NVJwDZIEcjacuXA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=n9KLjXG54zD5nFCXqGHYJz1ZCGMjNx4MjrSwYaLCagMT0d5jOA7Ql42QP/jyVKxOl WyH/nVjMD6yR8Zw3Ut4FLF2g1tZ351hEXfY9ltZmvSZKEEES8iuZqdIfZF+LDll/v0 4Ouk3jZ5v5wN7zL6x2ZhEMNqav1VVZMP1lqs9Z67ZxMv79/JpWjsFjzH9vg9+Z+++q wiXgYhxW43HUKJBV32Ms6HV+Bdqhj5mThE6+z6h3ZN8PcbndePIEjjJ7+MPJB1EBmy hkutms8W7aKyUu0a6cRL9NtzFritm3VP7iTrlUZ07NkUJVoyGvcjgK0LBuZrjK7n2T 8+zlzF7Gj5ueQ== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6C9A17E0523; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 12:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 12:12:23 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/16] dt-bindings: net: mediatek,net: add sram property To: Frank Wunderlich , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Chanwoo Choi , Georgi Djakov , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , Johnson Wang , =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Daniel Golle , Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau Cc: Frank Wunderlich , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20250706132213.20412-1-linux@fw-web.de> <20250706132213.20412-5-linux@fw-web.de> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250706132213.20412-5-linux@fw-web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 06/07/25 15:21, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto: > From: Frank Wunderlich > > Meditak Filogic SoCs (MT798x) have dedicated MMIO-SRAM for dma operations. > > MT7981 and MT7986 currently use static offset to ethernet MAC register > which will be changed in separate patch once this way is accepted. > > Add "sram" property to map ethernet controller to dedicated mmio-sram node. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich Honestly, I was more comfortable adding the sram to the reg list instead, but I know that you got a negative review for that. Oh well. Please disallow the sram property on SoCs that don't have the SRAM (sram: false), after which: Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno