From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas yang Subject: Re: [iproute2] tc action mirred question Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:35:00 +0800 Message-ID: References: <404956.88336.qm@web111607.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1252376168.5244.11.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <1252419044.5244.17.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com ([209.85.223.198]:53539 "EHLO mail-iw0-f198.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbZIHOlo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:41:44 -0400 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so50758iwn.22 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1252419044.5244.17.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Yes, of course. That was an example on how to use pedit. If you want > to be pedantic then note that no eth1 device is being used in the > original example and neither is itsensible to make changes to the MAC > address on ingress ;-> > In any case, please go and run some experiments to test the theories. > I think the idea of the original example is good, 'tc' is very useful. I will try some experiments to test the theories. : ) ------ regards, thomas