From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/27] bridge: use __vlan_hwaccel helpers Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:59:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Pablo Neira Ayuso (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP ,IP6,ARP,EB,NF}TABLES))" , "Patrick McHardy (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP ,EB,NF}TABLES))" , "Jozsef Kadlecsik (supporter:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP,EB,NF}TABLES))" , "Stephen Hemminger (maintainer:ETHERNET BRIDGE)" , "open list:NETFILTER ({IP,IP6,ARP,EB ,NF}TABLES)" , "moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello! On 12/13/2016 3:12 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote: > This removes assumption than vlan_tci != 0 when tag is present. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław > --- > net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 14 ++++++++------ > net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +- > net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 6 +++--- > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c > index b12501a..2cc0747 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c [...] > @@ -749,8 +747,12 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff > > data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage); > > - data->vlan_tci = skb->vlan_tci; > - data->vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto; > + if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) { > + data->vlan_tci = skb->vlan_tci; > + data->vlan_proto = skb->vlan_proto; > + } else > + data->vlan_proto = 0; CodingStyle: should use {} in all branches of *if* if at least one branch has {}. [...] > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c > index b6de4f4..ef94664 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c > @@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static bool __allowed_ingress(const struct net_bridge *br, > __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, br->vlan_proto, pvid); > else > /* Priority-tagged Frame. > - * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci had > - * VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit and its VID field was 0x000. > + * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci VID s/We/we/. > + * field was 0x000. Simply 0, maybe? [...] MBR, Sergei