From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for shorter family headers Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:24:29 -0600 Message-ID: References: <9fd4bf6f-47d1-4178-d16e-ec3b3d099ae3@gmail.com> <20181005.142230.532758670209479583.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , mfo@canonical.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:37223 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728510AbeJFEZE (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2018 00:25:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id j23-v6so5644445pfi.4 for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:24:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20181005.142230.532758670209479583.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/5/18 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:50:32 -0300 > >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:38 PM Mauricio Faria de Oliveira >> wrote: >>> Ok, thanks for your suggestions. >>> I'll do some research/learning on them, and give it a try for a v2. >> >> FYI, that is "[PATCH v2 net-next] rtnetlink: fix rtnl_fdb_dump() for >> ndmsg header". >> >> BTW, could please advise whether this should be net or net-next? It's a bug fix, >> but it's late in the cycle, and this is not urgent (the problem has been around >> since v4.12), so not sure it's really needed for v4.19. > > I've applied this to net and queued it up for -stable, thanks. > there was a v2 for this problem. I reviewed it and been testing it as part of the strict dump patches.