From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] lwtunnel: rename ip lwtunnel attributes
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:40:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6abe6522e88ea21d2ccf6e50f9e563fdf8f3a37.1439563196.git.jbenc@redhat.com> (raw)
We already have IFLA_IPTUN_ netlink attributes. The IP_TUN_ attributes look
very similar, yet they serve very different purpose. This is confusing for
anyone trying to implement a user space tool supporting lwt.
As the IP_TUN_ attributes are used only for the lightweight tunnels, prefix
them with LWTUNNEL_IP_ instead to make their purpose clear. Also, it's more
logical to have them in lwtunnel.h together with the encap enum.
Fixes: 3093fbe7ff4b ("route: Per route IP tunnel metadata via lightweight tunnel")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
---
These are still in net-next only, thus it's safe to change them.
It's still a bit weird these attributes are in RTA_ENCAP, perhaps we should
also rename RTA_ENCAP to RTA_LWT_ENCAP or similar?
---
include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h | 14 +++++++
include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 15 --------
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h b/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
index 31377bbea3f8..3bf223bc2367 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lwtunnel.h
@@ -12,5 +12,19 @@ enum lwtunnel_encap_types {
#define LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX (__LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX - 1)
+enum lwtunnel_ip_t {
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_UNSPEC,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_ID,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_DST,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT,
+ LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS,
+ __LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX,
+};
+
+#define LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX (__LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX - 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_LWTUNNEL_H_ */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
index 47d24cb3fbc1..0d3d3cc43356 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -286,21 +286,6 @@ enum rt_class_t {
/* Routing message attributes */
-enum ip_tunnel_t {
- IP_TUN_UNSPEC,
- IP_TUN_ID,
- IP_TUN_DST,
- IP_TUN_SRC,
- IP_TUN_TTL,
- IP_TUN_TOS,
- IP_TUN_SPORT,
- IP_TUN_DPORT,
- IP_TUN_FLAGS,
- __IP_TUN_MAX,
-};
-
-#define IP_TUN_MAX (__IP_TUN_MAX - 1)
-
enum rtattr_type_t {
RTA_UNSPEC,
RTA_DST,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c
index 5512f4e4ec1b..fd6319681c50 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c
@@ -192,15 +192,15 @@ struct rtnl_link_stats64 *ip_tunnel_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip_tunnel_get_stats64);
-static const struct nla_policy ip_tun_policy[IP_TUN_MAX + 1] = {
- [IP_TUN_ID] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
- [IP_TUN_DST] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [IP_TUN_SRC] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
- [IP_TUN_TTL] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
- [IP_TUN_TOS] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
- [IP_TUN_SPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [IP_TUN_DPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
- [IP_TUN_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+static const struct nla_policy ip_tun_policy[LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX + 1] = {
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_ID] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_DST] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+ [LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
};
static int ip_tun_build_state(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr,
@@ -208,10 +208,10 @@ static int ip_tun_build_state(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr,
{
struct ip_tunnel_info *tun_info;
struct lwtunnel_state *new_state;
- struct nlattr *tb[IP_TUN_MAX + 1];
+ struct nlattr *tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX + 1];
int err;
- err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IP_TUN_MAX, attr, ip_tun_policy);
+ err = nla_parse_nested(tb, LWTUNNEL_IP_MAX, attr, ip_tun_policy);
if (err < 0)
return err;
@@ -223,29 +223,29 @@ static int ip_tun_build_state(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr,
tun_info = lwt_tun_info(new_state);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_ID])
- tun_info->key.tun_id = nla_get_u64(tb[IP_TUN_ID]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_ID])
+ tun_info->key.tun_id = nla_get_u64(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_ID]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_DST])
- tun_info->key.ipv4_dst = nla_get_be32(tb[IP_TUN_DST]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_DST])
+ tun_info->key.ipv4_dst = nla_get_be32(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_DST]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_SRC])
- tun_info->key.ipv4_src = nla_get_be32(tb[IP_TUN_SRC]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC])
+ tun_info->key.ipv4_src = nla_get_be32(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_TTL])
- tun_info->key.ipv4_ttl = nla_get_u8(tb[IP_TUN_TTL]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL])
+ tun_info->key.ipv4_ttl = nla_get_u8(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_TOS])
- tun_info->key.ipv4_tos = nla_get_u8(tb[IP_TUN_TOS]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS])
+ tun_info->key.ipv4_tos = nla_get_u8(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_SPORT])
- tun_info->key.tp_src = nla_get_be16(tb[IP_TUN_SPORT]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT])
+ tun_info->key.tp_src = nla_get_be16(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_DPORT])
- tun_info->key.tp_dst = nla_get_be16(tb[IP_TUN_DPORT]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT])
+ tun_info->key.tp_dst = nla_get_be16(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT]);
- if (tb[IP_TUN_FLAGS])
- tun_info->key.tun_flags = nla_get_u16(tb[IP_TUN_FLAGS]);
+ if (tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS])
+ tun_info->key.tun_flags = nla_get_u16(tb[LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS]);
tun_info->mode = IP_TUNNEL_INFO_TX;
tun_info->options = NULL;
@@ -261,14 +261,14 @@ static int ip_tun_fill_encap_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
{
struct ip_tunnel_info *tun_info = lwt_tun_info(lwtstate);
- if (nla_put_u64(skb, IP_TUN_ID, tun_info->key.tun_id) ||
- nla_put_be32(skb, IP_TUN_DST, tun_info->key.ipv4_dst) ||
- nla_put_be32(skb, IP_TUN_SRC, tun_info->key.ipv4_src) ||
- nla_put_u8(skb, IP_TUN_TOS, tun_info->key.ipv4_tos) ||
- nla_put_u8(skb, IP_TUN_TTL, tun_info->key.ipv4_ttl) ||
- nla_put_u16(skb, IP_TUN_SPORT, tun_info->key.tp_src) ||
- nla_put_u16(skb, IP_TUN_DPORT, tun_info->key.tp_dst) ||
- nla_put_u16(skb, IP_TUN_FLAGS, tun_info->key.tun_flags))
+ if (nla_put_u64(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_ID, tun_info->key.tun_id) ||
+ nla_put_be32(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_DST, tun_info->key.ipv4_dst) ||
+ nla_put_be32(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC, tun_info->key.ipv4_src) ||
+ nla_put_u8(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS, tun_info->key.ipv4_tos) ||
+ nla_put_u8(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL, tun_info->key.ipv4_ttl) ||
+ nla_put_u16(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT, tun_info->key.tp_src) ||
+ nla_put_u16(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT, tun_info->key.tp_dst) ||
+ nla_put_u16(skb, LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS, tun_info->key.tun_flags))
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
@@ -276,14 +276,14 @@ static int ip_tun_fill_encap_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
static int ip_tun_encap_nlsize(struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate)
{
- return nla_total_size(8) /* IP_TUN_ID */
- + nla_total_size(4) /* IP_TUN_DST */
- + nla_total_size(4) /* IP_TUN_SRC */
- + nla_total_size(1) /* IP_TUN_TOS */
- + nla_total_size(1) /* IP_TUN_TTL */
- + nla_total_size(2) /* IP_TUN_SPORT */
- + nla_total_size(2) /* IP_TUN_DPORT */
- + nla_total_size(2); /* IP_TUN_FLAGS */
+ return nla_total_size(8) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_ID */
+ + nla_total_size(4) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_DST */
+ + nla_total_size(4) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_SRC */
+ + nla_total_size(1) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_TOS */
+ + nla_total_size(1) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_TTL */
+ + nla_total_size(2) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_SPORT */
+ + nla_total_size(2) /* LWTUNNEL_IP_DPORT */
+ + nla_total_size(2); /* LWTUNNEL_IP_FLAGS */
}
static const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops ip_tun_lwt_ops = {
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-14 14:40 Jiri Benc [this message]
2015-08-14 16:51 ` [PATCH net-next] lwtunnel: rename ip lwtunnel attributes Thomas Graf
2015-08-17 21:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6abe6522e88ea21d2ccf6e50f9e563fdf8f3a37.1439563196.git.jbenc@redhat.com \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).