From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-172.mta0.migadu.com (out-172.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0158F19067C for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762961242; cv=none; b=UIP/kHJb4alvlahIjf0acqo3/ilDER42s9+pDL2SLHGkq0/yKTbc4NsHUZF6J2vWRMY+sjrp05f5FH4LchKz7dmrHzE7iOr6QP4raDmPVos+U1F9oC2ex+np8K4F1OsIS4fmUcxsgzr4PlQWe+wYwjh5AV6NOvUixQrnAjlWnXw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762961242; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k8Xbh93K326Q294BpfNudl6MAbWI+uk6DZXLupxhhRE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XwACThibdv8PEtvJMRmMKa/1bJc1vU7CFM2aFi/PDejnEBbAUDw7JAloN4L6TyhsxVX8+e5nxV4kZBOGjH/9pfpJNAlzKCvH9IY8YRhTEx/LBRDFGWrQsjBU2NuJHJN748wNxoWL8zBWtstdhO9ml9S/X/zZ/RbRmKvjE8SRNlg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=jhYIWBml; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="jhYIWBml" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1762961237; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Rs57aKC+dzCFz9S0pk+SxlPQNFMFAlzZlXYGwekxgog=; b=jhYIWBml0eWeuCpIzNoi5z9eDYktk558M4Lgh51ySKl3Tef7vGaQ/Nd+MU/Ge6dFGp3LDh hql/Ar9QyhUKzroMs8wjlNcpnKIyL8B8AnISMdHGYtOd8c0QdZq5H/dV9r/+UqXZ7v2yrq QV7umttP6dw/a2d26c8rpOS6gCYoQDs= Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:27:14 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] ptp: ocp: A fix and refactoring To: Andy Shevchenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Richard Cochran , Jonathan Lemon , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni References: <20251111165232.1198222-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: <20251111165232.1198222-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 11/11/2025 16:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > ptp: ocp: Sort headers alphabetically > ptp: ocp: don't use "proxy" headers I don't see benefits of these 2 patches, what's the reason?