Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cphealy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: igb driver can cause cache invalidation of non-owned memory?
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:27:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f75cf1e1-d7e8-e044-188a-987f05f321a5@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161010.075731.2449861168238706.davem@davemloft.net>

>> Hmm...  I'm not about device writing to memory.
> 
> This absolutely is about whether the device wrote into the
> area or not.

Not only.
 
>> Sequence in igb driver is:
>>
>> dma_map(full_page)
>>   <device writes here>
>> sync_to_cpu(half_page);
>> skb_add_rx_frag(skb, half_page);
>> napi_gro_receive(skb);
>>   ...
>> dma_unmap(full_page)
>>
>> What I'm concerned about is - same area is first passed up to network
>> stack, and _later_ dma_unmap()ed.  Is this indeed safe?
> 
> dma_unmap() should never write anything unless the device has
> meanwhile written to that chunk of memory.

dma_unmap() for DMA_FROM_DEVICE never writes whatever to memory,
regardless of what device did.

dma_unmap() for DMA_FROM_DEVICE ensures that data written to memory
by device (if any) is visible to CPU. Cache may contain stale data
for that memory region. To drop that from cache, dma_unmap() for
DMA_FROM_DEVICE does cache invalidation.

static void arm_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
		size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
	if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
		__dma_page_dev_to_cpu(pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle)),
				      handle & ~PAGE_MASK, size, dir);
}

static void __dma_page_dev_to_cpu(struct page *page, unsigned long off,
	size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
...
	if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
		outer_inv_range(paddr, paddr + size);

		dma_cache_maint_page(page, off, size, dir, dmac_unmap_area);
	}
...
}


> If the device made no intervening writes into the area, dma_unmap()
> should not cause any data to be written to that area, period.

I'm not about writing.

I'm about just the opposite - dropping not-written data from cache.

- napi_gro_receive(skb) passes area to upper layers of the network stack,
- something in those layers - perhaps packet mangling or such - writes
  to the area,
- this write enters cache but does not end into memory immediately,
- at this moment, igb does dma_unmap(),
- write that was in cache but not yet in memory gets lost.


> In your example above, consider the case where the device never
> writes into the memory area after sync_to_cpu().  In that case
> there is nothing that dma_unmap() can possibly write.
> All the data has been synced

Non-synced data is write done by CPU executing upper layers of network stack,


Nikita

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-10 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-10  8:52 igb driver can cause cache invalidation of non-owned memory? Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-10  9:01 ` David Miller
2016-10-10  9:51   ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-10 11:57     ` David Miller
2016-10-10 12:27       ` Nikita Yushchenko [this message]
2016-10-10 12:31         ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-10 15:11         ` Alexander Duyck
2016-10-10 17:00           ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-10 17:38             ` Alexander Duyck
2016-10-12  6:55               ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-12 15:32                 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-10-12 16:03                   ` David Laight
2016-10-12 16:11                     ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-12 17:56                       ` Alexander Duyck
2016-10-12 18:12                         ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-12 18:30                           ` Alexander Duyck
2016-10-13 10:39                             ` David Laight
2016-10-13 11:00                             ` Nikita Yushchenko
2016-10-13 20:32                               ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f75cf1e1-d7e8-e044-188a-987f05f321a5@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox