From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix libbpf_print
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:37:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7b5339e-b682-c00a-afaf-a00e08aff5f7@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205002055.80759-1-sdf@google.com>
On 2/4/19 4:20 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> With the recent print rework we now have the following problem:
> pr_{warning,info,debug} expand to __pr which calls libbpf_print.
> libbpf_print does va_start and calls __libbpf_pr with va_list argument.
> In __base_pr we again do va_start. Because the next argument is a
> va_list, we don't get correct pointer to the argument (and print noting
> in my case, I don't know why it doesn't crash tbh).
>
> Fix this by changing libbpf_print_fn_t signature to accept va_list and
> remove unneeded calls to va_start in the existing users.
>
> Alternatively, this can we solved by exporting __libbpf_pr and
> changing __pr macro to (and killing libbpf_print):
> {
> if (__libbpf_pr)
> __libbpf_pr(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
It is my mistake. My early version did passed correctly and later
on I made some changes and did not test properly. Thanks for the fix!
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 14 ++++----------
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 3 +--
> tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 10 ++--------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 13 ++-----------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_libbpf_open.c | 10 ++--------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 10 ++--------
> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 84ca6c2bea91..47969aa0faf8 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -54,22 +54,16 @@
>
> #define __printf(a, b) __attribute__((format(printf, a, b)))
>
> -__printf(2, 3)
> -static int __base_pr(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format, ...)
> +static int __base_pr(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format,
> + va_list args)
> {
> - va_list args;
> - int err;
> -
> if (level == LIBBPF_DEBUG)
> return 0;
>
> - va_start(args, format);
> - err = vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> - va_end(args);
> - return err;
> + return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> }
>
> -static __printf(2, 3) libbpf_print_fn_t __libbpf_pr = __base_pr;
> +static libbpf_print_fn_t __libbpf_pr = __base_pr;
>
> void libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn_t fn)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index 19dbc1bed960..69a7c25eaccc 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -54,8 +54,7 @@ enum libbpf_print_level {
> };
>
> typedef int (*libbpf_print_fn_t)(enum libbpf_print_level level,
> - const char *, ...)
> - __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3)));
> + const char *, va_list ap);
>
> LIBBPF_API void libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn_t fn);
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> index 38afdbe6a9e0..037d8ff6a634 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
> @@ -25,15 +25,9 @@
> #include "c++/clang-c.h"
>
> static int libbpf_perf_print(enum libbpf_print_level level __attribute__((unused)),
> - const char *fmt, ...)
> + const char *fmt, va_list args)
> {
> - va_list args;
> - int ret;
> -
> - va_start(args, fmt);
> - ret = veprintf(1, verbose, pr_fmt(fmt), args);
> - va_end(args);
> - return ret;
> + return veprintf(1, verbose, pr_fmt(fmt), args);
> }
>
> struct bpf_prog_priv {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
> index aebaeff5a5a0..5afab823ffbe 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
> @@ -52,19 +52,10 @@ static int count_result(int err)
> return err;
> }
>
> -#define __printf(a, b) __attribute__((format(printf, a, b)))
> -
> -__printf(2, 3)
> static int __base_pr(enum libbpf_print_level level __attribute__((unused)),
> - const char *format, ...)
> + const char *format, va_list args)
> {
> - va_list args;
> - int err;
> -
> - va_start(args, format);
> - err = vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> - va_end(args);
> - return err;
> + return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> }
>
> #define BTF_INFO_ENC(kind, kind_flag, vlen) \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_libbpf_open.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_libbpf_open.c
> index b9ff3bf76544..1909ecf4d999 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_libbpf_open.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_libbpf_open.c
> @@ -36,19 +36,13 @@ static void usage(char *argv[])
>
> static bool debug = 0;
> static int libbpf_debug_print(enum libbpf_print_level level,
> - const char *fmt, ...)
> + const char *fmt, va_list args)
> {
> - va_list args;
> - int ret;
> -
> if (level == LIBBPF_DEBUG && !debug)
> return 0;
>
> - va_start(args, fmt);
> fprintf(stderr, "[%d] ", level);
> - ret = vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
> - va_end(args);
> - return ret;
> + return vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
> }
>
> #define EXIT_FAIL_LIBBPF EXIT_FAILURE
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> index 55d05102e7bf..c52bd90fbb34 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> @@ -1785,18 +1785,12 @@ static void test_task_fd_query_tp(void)
> }
>
> static int libbpf_debug_print(enum libbpf_print_level level,
> - const char *format, ...)
> + const char *format, va_list args)
> {
> - va_list args;
> - int ret;
> -
> if (level == LIBBPF_DEBUG)
> return 0;
>
> - va_start(args, format);
> - ret = vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> - va_end(args);
> - return ret;
> + return vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> }
>
> static void test_reference_tracking()
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-05 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-05 0:20 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix libbpf_print Stanislav Fomichev
2019-02-05 0:37 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2019-02-05 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-02-05 3:23 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7b5339e-b682-c00a-afaf-a00e08aff5f7@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).