From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3F01509B1 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714075181; cv=none; b=XrBS83LGS7jTri8o38hDTYgA3xT03QRMDj9nnxGYq3DY03Crt9bamaH5m+QdNao8VN6XSxbLCIfgwHVkoDUbpkBDpV1ane01Vkx6VukjeIADPU8LiCoBQH+o9HpD/dL8qP1EX+1DHKM4qfKYTvSwbOOea4Np0zaiJZLFD1GuEiY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714075181; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0rvsB1EywH9lMzyqqGRclLkfnfKLWSH3VAuu/tTeaZU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZZrnKd9hukVC6Bpl2kEanXimNZskRgZBG4BeDcTejbFYfgqz4vFW9Www07THZnERD7Qs+VPbV7wRf1XTPPXkjU6AOwkkuXgSRU06b2TaTqjgSEqhOvvJdYDpSYBwcn3BvVguFRb30wJo9mlWO0iny32+5iVjiBY9gaj0fGutiMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dkKA1cKA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dkKA1cKA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1714075179; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+LRzQpo2wEWrfoGFtG/XZ51EhpMoHFQaxbJ8lYpJ9PA=; b=dkKA1cKAq6U8YiP6/CPoYXsqbl3U/tIhUZSaBuvMP3EY7dvwUctp7eNJ4cjEUNiAPKvZP8 pJsIHz3eukkig2qxSc2nQd6GbVhWrwJ3Io8R44RytFBfY1y1k/2NtERv7MteXl50P14DOu XJBrmf1gKKuAX4eUiRVEzCRYlxsJeq8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-13-4AGjYgClMw2JrT6HPLtwJA-1; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:58:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4AGjYgClMw2JrT6HPLtwJA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFC928EC104; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.33.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A83440F17B; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:58:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements In-Reply-To: <20240424173000.21c12587@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:30:00 -0700") References: <20240424164405.GN42092@kernel.org> <20240424173000.21c12587@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:58:32 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:44:05 +0100 Simon Horman wrote: >> I have recently been exercising the Open vSwitch kernel selftests, >> using vng, > > Speaking of ovs tests, we currently don't run them in CI (and suffer > related skips in pmtu.sh) because Amazon Linux doesn't have ovs > packaged and building it looks pretty hard. > > Is there an easy way to build just the CLI tooling or get a pre-built > package somewhere? As Simon notes - we would need some support in the ovs-dpctl.py to set up the tunnel interfaces, and probably need to set them up for lwt and classic tunnels. I have a test branch where I have support for the former, and I can clean it up and submit it. > Or perhaps you'd be willing to run the OvS tests and we can move > the part of pmtu.sh into OvS test dir? I guess either would be fine, as long as they can get run.