From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: sched: set IPS_CONFIRMED in tmpl status only when commit is set in act_ct
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:07:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t4jlz7ulp.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ffd82b3acc34ebd09855a26eb148fcd59fa872c.1689541664.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (Xin Long's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:09:18 -0400")
Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> writes:
> With the following flows, the packets will be dropped if OVS TC offload is
> enabled.
>
> 'ip,ct_state=-trk,in_port=1 actions=ct(zone=1)'
> 'ip,ct_state=+trk+new+rel,in_port=1 actions=ct(commit,zone=1)'
> 'ip,ct_state=+trk+new+rel,in_port=1 actions=ct(commit,zone=2),normal'
>
> In the 1st flow, it finds the exp from the hashtable and removes it then
> creates the ct with this exp in act_ct. However, in the 2nd flow it goes
> to the OVS upcall at the 1st time. When the skb comes back from userspace,
> it has to create the ct again without exp(the exp was removed last time).
> With no 'rel' set in the ct, the 3rd flow can never get matched.
>
> In OVS conntrack, it works around it by adding its own exp lookup function
> ovs_ct_expect_find() where it doesn't remove the exp. Instead of creating
> a real ct, it only updates its keys with the exp and its master info. So
> when the skb comes back, the exp is still in the hashtable.
>
> However, we can't do this trick in act_ct, as tc flower match is using a
> real ct, and passing the exp and its master info to flower parsing via
> tc_skb_cb is also not possible (tc_skb_cb size is not big enough).
>
> The simple and clear fix is to not remove the exp at the 1st flow, namely,
> not set IPS_CONFIRMED in tmpl when commit is not set in act_ct.
>
> Reported-by: Shuang Li <shuali@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-16 21:09 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: handle the exp removal problem with ovs upcall properly Xin Long
2023-07-16 21:09 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] netfilter: allow exp not to be removed in nf_ct_find_expectation Xin Long
2023-07-19 16:07 ` Aaron Conole
2023-07-16 21:09 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: sched: set IPS_CONFIRMED in tmpl status only when commit is set in act_ct Xin Long
2023-07-19 16:07 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2023-07-19 16:44 ` Davide Caratti
2023-07-16 21:09 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] openvswitch: set IPS_CONFIRMED in tmpl status only when commit is set in conntrack Xin Long
2023-07-19 16:08 ` Aaron Conole
2024-06-17 20:10 ` Ilya Maximets
2024-06-18 11:34 ` Ilya Maximets
2024-06-18 14:58 ` Xin Long
2024-06-18 15:50 ` Ilya Maximets
2024-06-19 12:58 ` Ilya Maximets
2024-06-19 14:07 ` Xin Long
2024-06-19 17:30 ` Ilya Maximets
2024-06-19 20:11 ` Xin Long
2024-06-19 20:19 ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-19 20:50 ` Xin Long
2024-06-19 21:20 ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-19 22:10 ` Xin Long
2024-07-08 22:03 ` Xin Long
2024-07-08 22:38 ` Florian Westphal
2024-07-09 1:49 ` Xin Long
2024-07-09 5:49 ` Florian Westphal
2023-07-19 2:58 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: handle the exp removal problem with ovs upcall properly Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-19 3:01 ` Florian Westphal
2023-07-19 16:12 ` Florian Westphal
2023-07-19 13:31 ` Aaron Conole
2023-07-20 8:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7t4jlz7ulp.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).