From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] openvswitch: vport: fix race between linking and the device notifier
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 02:47:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t8q9lp3s5.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514184702.2461435-1-i.maximets@ovn.org> (Ilya Maximets's message of "Thu, 14 May 2026 20:46:31 +0200")
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org> writes:
> Sashiko reports that it is technically possible that we got the device
> reference, but by the time we're linking it to the OVS datapath, it
> may be already in the process of being deleted. In this case if the
> notifier wins the race for RTNL, it will see that the device is not
> yet in the OVS datapath (ovs_netdev_get_vport() will fail in the
> dp_device_event()) and will do nothing. Then the ovs_netdev_link()
> will take the RTNL and link the unregistering device to OVS datapath.
>
> Eventually, netdev_wait_allrefs_any() will re-broadcast the event and
> the device will be properly detached, but it will take at least a
> second before that happens, so it's not something we should rely on.
>
> Let's avoid linking the non-registered device in the first place.
>
> Note: As per documentation, RTNL doesn't protect the reg_state, but
> it actually does for all the state transitions we care about here,
> so it should not be necessary to use READ_ONCE or taking the instance
> lock. We can still do that, but we have a few more places even in
> this file where the reg_state is accessed without those while under
> RTNL, and many more places like this across the kernel code, so it
> might make more sense to change all of them in a more centralized
> fashion in the future, if necessary.
>
> Fixes: ccb1352e76cf ("net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components.")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 18:46 [PATCH net v2] openvswitch: vport: fix race between linking and the device notifier Ilya Maximets
2026-05-15 6:47 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2026-05-15 8:34 ` Eelco Chaudron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7t8q9lp3s5.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox