netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	 dev@openvswitch.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net] openvswitch: Set the skbuff pkt_type for proper pmtud support.
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:17:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7tbk6ztwzp.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C04D4FF-0ADF-45DC-B253-2CD5C997DA1B@redhat.com> (Eelco Chaudron's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:57:22 +0100")

Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> writes:

> On 25 Mar 2024, at 13:37, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
>> On 3/25/24 13:22, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 22 Mar 2024, at 20:06, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Open vSwitch is originally intended to switch at layer 2, only dealing with
>>>>> Ethernet frames.  With the introduction of l3 tunnels support, it crossed
>>>>> into the realm of needing to care a bit about some routing details when
>>>>> making forwarding decisions.  If an oversized packet would need to be
>>>>> fragmented during this forwarding decision, there is a chance for pmtu
>>>>> to get involved and generate a routing exception.  This is gated by the
>>>>> skbuff->pkt_type field.
>>>>>
>>>>> When a flow is already loaded into the openvswitch module this field is
>>>>> set up and transitioned properly as a packet moves from one port to
>>>>> another.  In the case that a packet execute is invoked after a flow is
>>>>> newly installed this field is not properly initialized.  This causes the
>>>>> pmtud mechanism to omit sending the required exception messages across
>>>>> the tunnel boundary and a second attempt needs to be made to make sure
>>>>> that the routing exception is properly setup.  To fix this, we set the
>>>>> outgoing packet's pkt_type to PACKET_OUTGOING, since it can only get
>>>>> to the openvswitch module via a port device or packet command.
>>>>
>>>> Is this not a problem when the packet comes from the bridge port in the kernel?
>>>
>>> It very well may be an issue there as well, but the recommendation is to
>>> operate with the bridge port down as far as I know, so I don't know if
>>> this issue has been observed happening from the bridge port.
>>
>> FWIW, bridge ports are typically used as an entry point for tunneled
>> traffic so it can egress from a physical port attached to OVS.  It means
>> they are pretty much always UP in most common setups like OpenStack or
>> ovn-kubernetes and handle a decent amount of traffic.  They are also used
>> to direct some other types of traffic to the host kernel.
>
> +1 here, I’m talking about the same port. I think we only advise
> having this down for userspace bridges, but not in the case the bridge
> is the tunnel endpoint.

Okay, I'll confirm about up/down, but it seems like it shouldn't matter
and we should be setting the outgoing type.

>> Unless I misunderstood which ports we're talking about here.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.


      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22 19:06 [PATCH net] openvswitch: Set the skbuff pkt_type for proper pmtud support Aaron Conole
2024-03-25  8:44 ` Eelco Chaudron
2024-03-25 12:22   ` Aaron Conole
2024-03-25 12:37     ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2024-03-25 12:57       ` Eelco Chaudron
2024-03-27 17:17         ` Aaron Conole [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7tbk6ztwzp.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).