From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B1F149E13 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720187366; cv=none; b=g9rPeibQR2nHIdNjqlwdqgwa/J68IKh8OA7ngUnCjEhUkzpiU0wYVmG3zbNbJcSQhpFiw95MQkbZst182QMp6PSPXx+ZANx+t74BQck97lRpyDRwWP8DVy8A3PtkYuHJ6fOw/Ji/Se8ZPeUjR0oXgkMy2MJLnA8zkkomCEsT4Kg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720187366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CYfhURpn07Fl/KzClRYCrH1tzsYglzsR+DDcVMkuswE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aTVYPUSChAfkL2vqo8h7UN2vL504EDjenRQKeBa3NrkJi1XJqxJY6A6caUKfJdH2UYxeEeYZDS5S7eBzaDbYHV/olekHjjb5npPsxoCyGIGBIa6+Y/FbkKtGZxXIQhOqLCAWdi73SYPEw7cQbujXfjtMGX6Fp5FzDVp22DtL2Aw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=CmWvdMo5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CmWvdMo5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1720187363; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=704ErwY8GGv8Ty+hDCVZyGwpzQ0W63+evkDASo4+BFI=; b=CmWvdMo54T+9tJEGiz7GzqMsrUX6vwSEkJH9o+bU11Nk4pKRw5+koqS4+wt0lLUGcTKdHy z9ThRz8GQBfB/QPFZ1aYUGmQ+R8xE3hAZ2uhKk/TGCV+NGkwAk8Zk2ATlaRUblC954/ZYw 0Cs0epkFivbFlZonMEuMAa9SvWIi7AE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-128-wIiO7IoEOdey9EFV8Z5Oog-1; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:49:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wIiO7IoEOdey9EFV8Z5Oog-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710E81955F40; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.8.34]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73A251955F66; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:49:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , =?utf-8?Q?Adri=C3=A1n?= Moreno , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: openvswitch: Address some flakes in the CI environment In-Reply-To: <20240705062851.36694176@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:28:51 -0700") References: <20240702132830.213384-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20240705062851.36694176@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:49:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:28:27 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: >> These patches aim to make using the openvswitch testsuite more reliable. >> These should address the major sources of flakiness in the openvswitch >> test suite allowing the CI infrastructure to exercise the openvswitch >> module for patch series. There should be no change for users who simply >> run the tests (except that patch 3/3 does make some of the debugging a bit >> easier by making some output more verbose). > > Hi Aaron! > > The results look solid on normal builds now, but with a debug kernel > the test is failing consistently: > > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-net-dbg&test=openvswitch-sh Yes - it shows a test case issue with the upcall and psample tests. Adrian and I discussed the correct approach would be using a wait_for instead of just sleeping, because it seems the dbg environment might be too racy. I think he is working on a follow up to submit after the psample work gets merged - we were hoping not to hold that patch series up with more potential conflicts or merge issues if that's okay.